Re: Regarding PHOENIX-1734

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 4:33 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Users not relying on local indexes can upgrade the server ahead of the > client, but users depending on local indexes will need to upgrade the > client and server together. The problem with bumping up the major

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3000) Reduce memory consumption during DISTINCT aggregation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated PHOENIX-3000: --- Attachment: 3000-v2.txt -v2, guard against very small backing arrays. Since we making a new

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2732) Update HBase versions in pom

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15335405#comment-15335405 ] Nick Dimiduk commented on PHOENIX-2732: --- Hey fellas -- was this change made in order to access

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2914) Make sqlline refer to bin/hbase-site.xml by default

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15335401#comment-15335401 ] Nick Dimiduk commented on PHOENIX-2914: --- Seems like this patch means we not longer require the

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

Samarth Jain created PHOENIX-3002: - Summary: Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes Key: PHOENIX-3002 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002 Project: Phoenix Issue

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3001) Dropping local index and recreation it with following split may cause RS failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15335198#comment-15335198 ] Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3001: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2952) array_length return negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15335170#comment-15335170 ] Joseph Sun commented on PHOENIX-2952: - It is not overflows.In class

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2993) Tephra: Prune invalid transaction set once all data for a given invalid transaction has been dropped

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15335134#comment-15335134 ] Andreas Neumann commented on PHOENIX-2993: -- Nice design doc. Two questions: - how will the

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3001) Dropping local index and recreation it with following split may cause RS failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sergey Soldatov updated PHOENIX-3001: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3001.patch > Dropping local index and recreation it with following

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2276) Creating index on a global view on a multi-tenant table fails with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15335059#comment-15335059 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-2276: --- Looking into test failures caused by my checkin. >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2961) select on a composite primary key fails when DESC is set in the table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15335005#comment-15335005 ] Dhiraj Hegde commented on PHOENIX-2961: --- [~giacomotaylor] The second test script attached to this

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2931) Phoenix client asks users to provide configs in cli that are present on the machine in hbase conf

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alicia Ying Shu updated PHOENIX-2931: - Fix Version/s: 4.8.0 > Phoenix client asks users to provide configs in cli that are

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3000) Reduce memory consumption during DISTINCT aggregation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334854#comment-15334854 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3000: It depends. :) Not copying it better if we (say) pipe a

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2931) Phoenix client asks users to provide configs in cli that are present on the machine in hbase conf

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alicia Ying Shu updated PHOENIX-2931: - Attachment: PHOENIX-2931-v1.patch > Phoenix client asks users to provide configs in cli

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2931) Phoenix client asks users to provide configs in cli that are present on the machine in hbase conf

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334811#comment-15334811 ] Alicia Ying Shu commented on PHOENIX-2931: -- There are 2 options for the solution. One is

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2940) Remove STATS RPCs from rowlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334788#comment-15334788 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2940: --- bq. Clearing the table from the cache also does

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2979) ScannerLeaseRenewalIT tests are failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334782#comment-15334782 ] Sean Busbey commented on PHOENIX-2979: -- yep, currently working for me. > ScannerLeaseRenewalIT

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2979) ScannerLeaseRenewalIT tests are failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334774#comment-15334774 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-2979: --- If the test flaps again, we can possibly increase the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2979) ScannerLeaseRenewalIT tests are failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334772#comment-15334772 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2979: --- So just to confirm, it's working for you now, [~busbey]?

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2979) ScannerLeaseRenewalIT tests are failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334747#comment-15334747 ] Sean Busbey commented on PHOENIX-2979: -- In my case the failure was caused by a local change that

Re: RC on Monday

Hi All, Changing the date for RC on Monday instead of Today. As following JIRAs still needs to get in. PHOENIX-3001(NPE during split on table with deleted local Indexes. PHOENIX-2940(Remove Stats RPC from meta table build lock) Regards, Ankit Singhal On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Ankit

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3000) Reduce memory consumption during DISTINCT aggregation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334517#comment-15334517 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3000: --- +1 on the patch. That's pretty interesting, [~lhofhansl].

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2276) Creating index on a global view on a multi-tenant table fails with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334469#comment-15334469 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-2276: --- +1. Thanks so much, [~maryannxue]. I will commit the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3000) Reduce memory consumption during DISTINCT aggregation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334458#comment-15334458 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3000: I remember there's some memory management code in

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2940) Remove STATS RPCs from rowlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334419#comment-15334419 ] Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-2940: - bq. Not sure I understand this new logic, as it seems like we

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2276) Creating index on a global view on a multi-tenant table fails with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Maryann Xue updated PHOENIX-2276: - Attachment: PHOENIX-2276.fix Realized that I had made a small mistake in the previous "fix"

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2952) array_length return negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334075#comment-15334075 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2952: --- Would you mind taking a look, [~ram_krish] and repro

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2891) Support system-wide UDFs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334078#comment-15334078 ] Nick Dimiduk commented on PHOENIX-2891: --- bq. Similar to HBase "system coprocessors" in concept and

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2178) Tracing - total time listed for a certain trace does not correlate with query wall clock time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334009#comment-15334009 ] Pranavan commented on PHOENIX-2178: --- I made a PR to HR -

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2979) ScannerLeaseRenewalIT tests are failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15333709#comment-15333709 ] Sean Busbey commented on PHOENIX-2979: -- it's my local branch, which is based on Phoenix 4.7.0

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2952) array_length return negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15333635#comment-15333635 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on PHOENIX-2952: - So the negative value is because the

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3001) Dropping local index and recreation it with following split may cause RS failure

Sergey Soldatov created PHOENIX-3001: Summary: Dropping local index and recreation it with following split may cause RS failure Key: PHOENIX-3001 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3001

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3000) Reduce memory consumption during DISTINCT aggregation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15333239#comment-15333239 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3000: We should probably also keep track of the size of the

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3000) Reduce memory consumption during DISTINCT aggregation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated PHOENIX-3000: --- Attachment: 3000.txt Here's a simple fix. Copy the key, unless it occupies more than 10% of

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3000) Reduce memory consumption during DISTINCT aggregation

Lars Hofhansl created PHOENIX-3000: -- Summary: Reduce memory consumption during DISTINCT aggregation Key: PHOENIX-3000 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3000 Project: Phoenix