[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3777) NTH_VALUE() function with multiple where clause filters on primary key components with GROUP BY is returning results for first grouped set and not for all grouped set

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969741#comment-15969741 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3777: --- [~singamteja] - have you been able to write a unit test

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-3789. --- Resolution: Not A Problem > Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969615#comment-15969615 ] Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3789: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969610#comment-15969610 ] Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3789: - Ok. So there's only the pre hook thing to look at,

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969593#comment-15969593 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3789: --- bq. If the mutation's durability is SKIP_WAL then Indexer

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3790) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock when WAL edits are disabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969577#comment-15969577 ] Andrew Purtell edited comment on PHOENIX-3790 at 4/14/17 9:53 PM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969573#comment-15969573 ] Andrew Purtell edited comment on PHOENIX-3789 at 4/14/17 9:52 PM: --

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3791) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock for transactional tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3791: -- Description: A corner case related to PHOENIX-3789. Transactional, mutable secondary index

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3790) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock when WAL edits are disabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969577#comment-15969577 ] Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3790: - [~giacomotaylor] [~gjacoby] Wouldn't it be fair to

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969573#comment-15969573 ] Andrew Purtell edited comment on PHOENIX-3789 at 4/14/17 9:49 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969573#comment-15969573 ] Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3789: - [~giacomotaylor] [~gjacoby] Wouldn't it be fair to

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3791) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock for transactional tables

James Taylor created PHOENIX-3791: - Summary: Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock for transactional tables Key: PHOENIX-3791 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3791

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969568#comment-15969568 ] Geoffrey Jacoby commented on PHOENIX-3789: -- Thanks, [~apurtell] and [~jamestaylor]. +1 from me

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969563#comment-15969563 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3789: --- The preMutateBatch only makes cross region calls if WAL

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969561#comment-15969561 ] Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3789: - If the mutation's durability is SKIP_WAL then Indexer

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969549#comment-15969549 ] Geoffrey Jacoby commented on PHOENIX-3789: -- It appears that the preMutateBatch code can make

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969540#comment-15969540 ] Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3789: - bq. I see in Indexer there are also overrides in

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969537#comment-15969537 ] Geoffrey Jacoby commented on PHOENIX-3789: -- I see in Indexer there are also overrides in

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3789: -- Attachment: PHOENIX-3789_v2.patch Slight tweak to patch that doesn't submit index updates if

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969506#comment-15969506 ] Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3789: - FWIW, after HBASE-17210 at least rowlock acquisition

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969503#comment-15969503 ] Andrew Purtell commented on PHOENIX-3789: - +1 [~giacomotaylor] I think the change is needed so

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3788) GLOBAL_MUTATION_BATCH_SIZE should reflect size of chunked batches

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969456#comment-15969456 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3788: --- Another, slightly more complex issue is when mutations

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3789: -- Attachment: PHOENIX-3789.patch Please review, [~apurtell]. > Execute cross region index

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3789) Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock

James Taylor created PHOENIX-3789: - Summary: Execute cross region index maintenance calls outside of row lock Key: PHOENIX-3789 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3789 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3783) Lower max mutation bytes to create smaller MutationState chunks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969411#comment-15969411 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3783: --- I think this would be too low of a default for

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3783) Lower max mutation bytes to create smaller MutationState chunks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969403#comment-15969403 ] Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3783: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3788) GLOBAL_MUTATION_BATCH_SIZE should reflect size of chunked batches

Geoffrey Jacoby created PHOENIX-3788: Summary: GLOBAL_MUTATION_BATCH_SIZE should reflect size of chunked batches Key: PHOENIX-3788 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3788 Project:

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3783) Lower max mutation bytes to create smaller MutationState chunks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Geoffrey Jacoby updated PHOENIX-3783: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3783.patch > Lower max mutation bytes to create smaller

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3360) Secondary index configuration is wrong

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969204#comment-15969204 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-3360: -- Yes [~jamestaylor] we have observed

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3360) Secondary index configuration is wrong

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15969126#comment-15969126 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3360: --- Did you verify that the RS->RS index updates are being

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3360) Secondary index configuration is wrong

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15968885#comment-15968885 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-3360: -- [~jamestaylor] We have tested the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3360) Secondary index configuration is wrong

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15968721#comment-15968721 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3360: --- Thanks, [~samarthjain]. Did you check whether or not

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3360) Secondary index configuration is wrong

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Samarth Jain updated PHOENIX-3360: -- Attachment: indexlogging.patch [~mujtabachohan] and I tested locally with HBase 0.98 that we