[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3734) Refactor Phoenix to use TAL instead of direct calls to Tephra

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060256#comment-16060256 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3734: --- [~tdsilva] - would you mind committing this now that 4.11

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060240#comment-16060240 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3970: --- I think there are two separate issues identified here and

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3633) null pointer exception when subsquery for not exists returns empty result set

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060231#comment-16060231 ] Sergey Soldatov commented on PHOENIX-3633: -- The issue is reproducible on the master branch and

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3964) Index.preWALRestore should handle index write failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060230#comment-16060230 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3964: --- [~enis], [~rajeshbabu], [~an...@apache.org] - would you

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060187#comment-16060187 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3970: bq. If index handler pool on RS1 is being used to write

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060164#comment-16060164 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3970: Yes, that's possible. I suppose scan and index write on

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060126#comment-16060126 ] Sergey Soldatov commented on PHOENIX-3974: -- [~samarthjain] Hm. I saw you comment about 0.98

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060125#comment-16060125 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3974: --- Another thing that would be good to confirm would be to

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060123#comment-16060123 ] Sergey Soldatov commented on PHOENIX-3970: -- [~lhofhansl] The only case when lack of handlers

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060100#comment-16060100 ] Sergey Soldatov commented on PHOENIX-3974: -- [~samarthjain] 1.3.1, but this behavior is the same

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060077#comment-16060077 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3970: I still think this patch is an improvement, since it

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060078#comment-16060078 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3974: --- With 0.98 we noticed that we had to set both the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060071#comment-16060071 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3970: Unfortunately that is true even without using regular

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060062#comment-16060062 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3974: I don't think you want to generally do this, no? Just

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060057#comment-16060057 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3974: --- [~sergey.soldatov] - what version of HBase are you using?

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060033#comment-16060033 ] Sergey Soldatov commented on PHOENIX-3974: -- [~samarthjain] I had only scheduler in the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060025#comment-16060025 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3974: --- [~sergey.soldatov] - do you run into this issue with or

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16060023#comment-16060023 ] Sergey Soldatov commented on PHOENIX-3970: -- It looks like the same problem I had in

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16059764#comment-16059764 ] Sergey Soldatov commented on PHOENIX-3974: -- There is a small note. The documentation still says

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sergey Soldatov updated PHOENIX-3974: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3974.patch > Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3974) Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers

Sergey Soldatov created PHOENIX-3974: Summary: Create index may issue a distributed dead lock due lack of handlers Key: PHOENIX-3974 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3974

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16059697#comment-16059697 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3970: Doing the rebuild asynchronously is best. Doing

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3964) Index.preWALRestore should handle index write failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16059572#comment-16059572 ] chenglei commented on PHOENIX-3964: --- [~jamestaylor],please help me have a review? >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3973) Immutable tables using encoding are failing in phoenix-calcite

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3973: --- Labels: calcite (was: ) > Immutable tables using encoding are failing in phoenix-calcite >

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-3973) Immutable tables using encoding are failing in phoenix-calcite

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal resolved PHOENIX-3973. Resolution: Fixed > Immutable tables using encoding are failing in phoenix-calcite >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3973) Immutable tables using encoding are failing in phoenix-calcite

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3973: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-3973.patch > Immutable tables using encoding are failing in

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3973) Immutable tables using encoding are failing in phoenix-calcite

Ankit Singhal created PHOENIX-3973: -- Summary: Immutable tables using encoding are failing in phoenix-calcite Key: PHOENIX-3973 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3973 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3944) ReadOnlyTableException occurs when we map Phoenix view to an existing HBase table with Namespace Mapping enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16059268#comment-16059268 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3944: - Github user brfrn169 commented on a diff in the pull

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #261: PHOENIX-3944 ReadOnlyTableException occurs when w...

Github user brfrn169 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/261#discussion_r123495453 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/FromCompiler.java --- @@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ public static ColumnResolver

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3944) ReadOnlyTableException occurs when we map Phoenix view to an existing HBase table with Namespace Mapping enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16059264#comment-16059264 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3944: - Github user brfrn169 commented on a diff in the pull

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #261: PHOENIX-3944 ReadOnlyTableException occurs when w...

Github user brfrn169 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/261#discussion_r123495103 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/util/SchemaUtil.java --- @@ -1016,7 +1017,8 @@ public static TableName getPhysicalTableName(byte[]

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3944) ReadOnlyTableException occurs when we map Phoenix view to an existing HBase table with Namespace Mapping enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16059256#comment-16059256 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3944: - Github user brfrn169 commented on a diff in the pull

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #261: PHOENIX-3944 ReadOnlyTableException occurs when w...

Github user brfrn169 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/261#discussion_r123493994 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/query/ConnectionQueryServicesImpl.java --- @@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@ public MetaDataMutationResult

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3769) OnDuplicateKeyIT#testNewAndMultiDifferentUpdateOnSingleColumn fails on ppc64le

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16059196#comment-16059196 ] Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3769: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3769) OnDuplicateKeyIT#testNewAndMultiDifferentUpdateOnSingleColumn fails on ppc64le

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sneha Kanekar updated PHOENIX-3769: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-3769.patch >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3971) Disable assertion in ConnectionQueryServicesTestImpl to get builds passing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16058939#comment-16058939 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-3971: - FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Phoenix-master #1667 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3971) Disable assertion in ConnectionQueryServicesTestImpl to get builds passing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16058937#comment-16058937 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3971: --- Please file a JIRA for re-enabling too, [~samarthjain] -

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16058880#comment-16058880 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3970: --- The chances of running into a deadlock when using the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16058879#comment-16058879 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3970: --- I think we need a way to repro the deadlock issue before

[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-3972) Phoenix does not verify the SQL type while creating the User Defined Function

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla reassigned PHOENIX-3972: Assignee: Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla > Phoenix does not verify the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3970) Ensure that automatic partial index rebuilds are served from the index handler pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16058865#comment-16058865 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3970: Why does it have to be? I think this is as good as it

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3972) Phoenix does not verify the SQL type while creating the User Defined Function

neha created PHOENIX-3972: - Summary: Phoenix does not verify the SQL type while creating the User Defined Function Key: PHOENIX-3972 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3972 Project: Phoenix