Switched PreCommit-Admin over to Apache Yetus

bcc: bui...@apache.org, d...@hbase.apache.org, d...@hive.apache.org, common-...@hadoop.apache.org, dev@phoenix.apache.org, d...@oozie.apache.org (These are all of the projects that had pending issues. This is not all of the groups that actually rely upon this code...) The

UDF for lateral views

I would like to convert a column of ARRAY data-type such that each element of the array is returned as a row. Hive supports it via Lateral Views ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+LateralView )? Does UDF framework in Phoenix allow for building such functions?

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16328118#comment-16328118 ] Vincent Poon commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- [~jamestaylor] Can you review the fix?  I think we only

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vincent Poon updated PHOENIX-4531: -- Attachment: PHOENIX-4531.v1.master.patch > Delete on a table with a global mutable index can

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16328086#comment-16328086 ] Vincent Poon commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- This is something more general.  I just put the test in

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0

This vote is now closed and passes with 3 binding +1 votes and no -1 or +0 votes. Thanks everyone. On 16 January 2018 at 23:17, Flavio Pompermaier wrote: > +1 on my side. Activated parcel in Cloudera 5.11.2, enabled namespaces and > successfully runned a bulk loading

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16328060#comment-16328060 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- Is this specifically when an index is getting partially

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16328053#comment-16328053 ] Vincent Poon commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- [~jamestaylor] attached a test

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vincent Poon updated PHOENIX-4531: -- Attachment: PartialIndexRebuilderIT.java > Delete on a table with a global mutable index can

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16328049#comment-16328049 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- Note too, that the client must be on 4.13 for this to

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16328040#comment-16328040 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- Are you sure this is the case, [~vincentpoon]? There's no

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16328032#comment-16328032 ] Vincent Poon commented on PHOENIX-4531: --- This is also problematic because the delete against the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4530) Do not collect delete markers during major compaction of table with disabled mutable indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16328027#comment-16328027 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4530: --- FYI, [~vincentpoon] & [~lhofhansl]. > Do not collect

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4530) Do not collect delete markers during major compaction of table with disabled mutable indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4530: -- Environment:(was: If major compaction occurs on a table with mutable indexes that have

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-4531) Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index

Vincent Poon created PHOENIX-4531: - Summary: Delete on a table with a global mutable index can issue client-side deletes against the index Key: PHOENIX-4531 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4531

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4530) Do not collect delete markers during major compaction of table with disabled mutable indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4530: -- Description: If major compaction occurs on a table with mutable indexes that have the

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-4530) Do not collect delete markers during major compaction of table with disabled mutable indexes

James Taylor created PHOENIX-4530: - Summary: Do not collect delete markers during major compaction of table with disabled mutable indexes Key: PHOENIX-4530 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4530

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0

+1 on my side. Activated parcel in Cloudera 5.11.2, enabled namespaces and successfully runned a bulk loading yarn job (parquet-thrift to phoenix salted table) On 2018-01-13 12:30, Pedro Boado wrote: > Hello Everyone,> > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0

+1. All unit tests pass successfully. On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Mujtaba Chohan wrote: > +1. Ran tests and verified signatures. > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Samarth Jain wrote: > > > +1. Ran unit tests successfully. Executed some manual

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4528) PhoenixAccessController checks permissions only at table level when creating views

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16327862#comment-16327862 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4528: - Github user twdsilva commented on a diff in the pull

[GitHub] phoenix pull request #289: PHOENIX-4528 PhoenixAccessController checks permi...

Github user twdsilva commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/289#discussion_r161893623 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/ChangePermissionsIT.java --- @@ -267,4 +267,26 @@ public void testMultiTenantTables() throws

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0

+1. Ran tests and verified signatures. On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Samarth Jain wrote: > +1. Ran unit tests successfully. Executed some manual tests around > secondary indexes and stats collection - looks fine. > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Pedro Boado

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0

+1. Ran unit tests successfully. Executed some manual tests around secondary indexes and stats collection - looks fine. On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Pedro Boado wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.13.2 for CDH 5.11.2 RC0. This >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1556) Base hash versus sort merge join decision on how much data will be scanned

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-1556: -- Description: At compile time, we know how many guideposts (i.e. how many bytes) will be