[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-07-10 Thread Eli Levine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14622640#comment-14622640 ] Eli Levine commented on PHOENIX-1779: - I think you are right. If RVCs are used for

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-07-10 Thread Eli Levine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14622586#comment-14622586 ] Eli Levine commented on PHOENIX-1779: - Going through some code that uses row-value

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-07-10 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14622598#comment-14622598 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- For paged queries to work, you'd need to

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-17 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14499411#comment-14499411 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- That's very nice, [~samarthjain]. +1 to

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14500548#comment-14500548 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-1779: - SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix-master #690 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14500725#comment-14500725 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-1779: - SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix-master #692 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-16 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14497617#comment-14497617 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- I'd also get rid of currentIterator() and

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-16 Thread Samarth Jain (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14497624#comment-14497624 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- bq. When is this else case ever executed

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-15 Thread Samarth Jain (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14496713#comment-14496713 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- Perf numbers with the latest patch.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-15 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14496754#comment-14496754 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- Nice. Please file a follow up JIRA for

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-15 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14497559#comment-14497559 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- Thanks for the revisions, [~samarthjain].

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-14 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14494751#comment-14494751 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- bq. Having two parallel arrays sounds

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-14 Thread Samarth Jain (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14494736#comment-14494736 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- bq. Can you add a row count check to this

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-14 Thread Samarth Jain (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14494782#comment-14494782 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- Agreed on the index part. I realized that

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-14 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14494530#comment-14494530 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- Looking good, [~samarthjain]. Here's some

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-04-07 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14483406#comment-14483406 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- Impressive! Nice work. Parallelize

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-03-26 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382491#comment-14382491 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- Awesome, [~samarthjain]. Apart from the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1779) Parallelize fetching of next batch of records for scans corresponding to queries with no order by

2015-03-26 Thread Samarth Jain (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14383011#comment-14383011 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-1779: --- I verified manually that queries and