subject:"\"\\\[jira\\\] \\\[Updated\\\] \\\(PHOENIX\\\-4690\\\) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving\""

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-18 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4690_v2.patch

> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.14.0, 4.13.2
>Reporter: chenglei
>Assignee: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.14.0, 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4690_4.x-HBase-1.2_v2.patch, 
> PHOENIX-4690_v1.patch, PHOENIX-4690_v2.patch
>
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> The problem is caused by the {{GroupBy.compile}}, obviously, in line 154, for 
> {{group by pk2,pk1}},
> {{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the 
> {{pk2,pk1}} to {{pk1,pk2}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  
> but in line 158, for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still 
> {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual {{pk1,pk2}}:
> {code}
> 141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
> tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
> 142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
> 143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
> 144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
> 145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
> OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
> expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
> 146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
> 147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
> 148tracker.track(expression);
> 149}
> 150
> 151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
> columns. We further check here that
> 152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
> (i.e. we start with the first PK
> 153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
> 154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
> 155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
> tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
> 156}
> 157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
> 158return new 
> GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
> .setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
> 159 }
> {code}
> Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in {{OrderByCompiler.compile}}, 
> because {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} 
> is consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}} created in 
> above  {{GroupBy.compile}} method, so the result of  
> {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is {{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.
> But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expressions is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so 
> we need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-18 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4690_4.x-HBase-1.2_v2.patch

> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.14.0, 4.13.2
>Reporter: chenglei
>Assignee: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.14.0, 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4690_4.x-HBase-1.2_v2.patch, 
> PHOENIX-4690_v1.patch, PHOENIX-4690_v2.patch
>
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> The problem is caused by the {{GroupBy.compile}}, obviously, in line 154, for 
> {{group by pk2,pk1}},
> {{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the 
> {{pk2,pk1}} to {{pk1,pk2}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  
> but in line 158, for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still 
> {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual {{pk1,pk2}}:
> {code}
> 141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
> tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
> 142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
> 143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
> 144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
> 145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
> OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
> expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
> 146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
> 147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
> 148tracker.track(expression);
> 149}
> 150
> 151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
> columns. We further check here that
> 152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
> (i.e. we start with the first PK
> 153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
> 154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
> 155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
> tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
> 156}
> 157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
> 158return new 
> GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
> .setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
> 159 }
> {code}
> Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in {{OrderByCompiler.compile}}, 
> because {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} 
> is consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}} created in 
> above  {{GroupBy.compile}} method, so the result of  
> {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is {{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.
> But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expressions is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so 
> we need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-15 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Fix Version/s: 5.0.0

> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.14.0, 4.13.2
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.14.0, 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4690_v1.patch
>
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> The problem is caused by the {{GroupBy.compile}}, obviously, in line 154, for 
> {{group by pk2,pk1}},
> {{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the 
> {{pk2,pk1}} to {{pk1,pk2}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  
> but in line 158, for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still 
> {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual {{pk1,pk2}}:
> {code}
> 141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
> tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
> 142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
> 143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
> 144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
> 145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
> OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
> expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
> 146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
> 147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
> 148tracker.track(expression);
> 149}
> 150
> 151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
> columns. We further check here that
> 152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
> (i.e. we start with the first PK
> 153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
> 154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
> 155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
> tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
> 156}
> 157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
> 158return new 
> GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
> .setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
> 159 }
> {code}
> Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in {{OrderByCompiler.compile}}, 
> because {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} 
> is consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}} created in 
> above  {{GroupBy.compile}} method, so the result of  
> {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is {{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.
> But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expressions is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so 
> we need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-15 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.14.0

> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.14.0, 4.13.2
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.14.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4690_v1.patch
>
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> The problem is caused by the {{GroupBy.compile}}, obviously, in line 154, for 
> {{group by pk2,pk1}},
> {{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the 
> {{pk2,pk1}} to {{pk1,pk2}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  
> but in line 158, for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still 
> {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual {{pk1,pk2}}:
> {code}
> 141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
> tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
> 142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
> 143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
> 144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
> 145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
> OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
> expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
> 146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
> 147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
> 148tracker.track(expression);
> 149}
> 150
> 151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
> columns. We further check here that
> 152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
> (i.e. we start with the first PK
> 153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
> 154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
> 155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
> tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
> 156}
> 157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
> 158return new 
> GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
> .setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
> 159 }
> {code}
> Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in {{OrderByCompiler.compile}}, 
> because {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} 
> is consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}} created in 
> above  {{GroupBy.compile}} method, so the result of  
> {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is {{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.
> But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expressions is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so 
> we need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-15 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Affects Version/s: 4.14.0

> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.14.0, 4.13.2
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.14.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4690_v1.patch
>
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> The problem is caused by the {{GroupBy.compile}}, obviously, in line 154, for 
> {{group by pk2,pk1}},
> {{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the 
> {{pk2,pk1}} to {{pk1,pk2}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  
> but in line 158, for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still 
> {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual {{pk1,pk2}}:
> {code}
> 141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
> tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
> 142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
> 143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
> 144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
> 145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
> OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
> expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
> 146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
> 147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
> 148tracker.track(expression);
> 149}
> 150
> 151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
> columns. We further check here that
> 152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
> (i.e. we start with the first PK
> 153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
> 154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
> 155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
> tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
> 156}
> 157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
> 158return new 
> GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
> .setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
> 159 }
> {code}
> Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in {{OrderByCompiler.compile}}, 
> because {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} 
> is consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}} created in 
> above  {{GroupBy.compile}} method, so the result of  
> {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is {{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.
> But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expressions is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so 
> we need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the {{GroupBy.compile}}, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
to {{pk1,pk2}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, 
for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the 
actual {{pk1,pk2}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
.setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code}

Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in {{OrderByCompiler.compile}}, 
because {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} is 
consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}} created in above  
{{GroupBy.compile}} method, so the result of  {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is 
{{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.

But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expressions is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so 
we need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the {{GroupBy.compile}}, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
to {{pk1,pk2}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, 
for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the {{GroupBy.compile}}, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
to {{pk1,pk2}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, 
for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the 
actual {{pk1,pk2}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
.setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code}

Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in {{OrderByCompiler.compile}}, 
because {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} is 
consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}} created in above  
{{GroupBy.compile}} method, so the result of  {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is 
{{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.

But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expression is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so we 
need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after
the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the {{GroupBy.compile}}, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, for the new 
GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the {{GroupBy.compile}}, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, for the new 
GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual 
{{pk1,pk2}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
.setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code}

Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in {{OrderByCompiler.compile}}, 
because {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} is 
consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}} created in above  
{{GroupBy.compile}} method, so the result of  {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is 
{{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.

But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expression is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so we 
need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after
the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, for the new 
GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual 
{{pk1,p

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, for the new 
GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual 
{{pk1,pk2}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
.setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code}

Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in OrderByCompiler.compile, because 
{{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} is 
consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}} created in above  
{{GroupBy.compile}} method, so the result of  {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is 
{{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.

But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expression is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so we 
need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after
the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, for the new 
GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual 
{{pk1,pk2}}:

{

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4690_v1.patch

> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.13.2
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4690_v1.patch
>
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
> {{group by pk2,pk1}},
> {{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the 
> {{pk2,pk1}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, 
> for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the 
> actual {{pk1,pk2}}:
> {code}
> 141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
> tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
> 142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
> 143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
> 144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
> 145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
> OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
> expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
> 146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
> 147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
> 148tracker.track(expression);
> 149}
> 150
> 151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
> columns. We further check here that
> 152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
> (i.e. we start with the first PK
> 153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
> 154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
> 155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
> tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
> 156}
> 157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
> 158return new 
> GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
> .setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
> 159 }
> {code}
> Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in OrderByCompiler.compile, because 
> {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} is 
> consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}}, so  the result 
> of  {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is {{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.
> But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expression is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so 
> we need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after
> the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Attachment: (was: PHOENIX-4690.patch)

> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.13.2
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
> {{group by pk2,pk1}},
> {{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the 
> {{pk2,pk1}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, 
> for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the 
> actual {{pk1,pk2}}:
> {code}
> 141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
> tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
> 142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
> 143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
> 144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
> 145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
> OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
> expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
> 146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
> 147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
> 148tracker.track(expression);
> 149}
> 150
> 151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
> columns. We further check here that
> 152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
> (i.e. we start with the first PK
> 153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
> 154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
> 155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
> tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
> 156}
> 157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
> 158return new 
> GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
> .setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
> 159 }
> {code}
> Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in OrderByCompiler.compile, because 
> {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} is 
> consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}}, so  the result 
> of  {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is {{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.
> But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expression is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so 
> we need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after
> the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4690.patch

> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.13.2
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4690.patch
>
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
> {{group by pk2,pk1}},
> {{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the 
> {{pk2,pk1}} following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, 
> for the new GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the 
> actual {{pk1,pk2}}:
> {code}
> 141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
> tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
> 142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
> 143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
> 144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
> 145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
> OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
> expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
> 146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
> 147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
> 148tracker.track(expression);
> 149}
> 150
> 151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
> columns. We further check here that
> 152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
> (i.e. we start with the first PK
> 153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
> 154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
> 155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
> tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
> 156}
> 157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
> 158return new 
> GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
> .setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
> 159 }
> {code}
> Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in OrderByCompiler.compile, because 
> {{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} is 
> consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}}, so  the result 
> of  {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is {{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.
> But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expression is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so 
> we need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after
> the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, for the new 
GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual 
{{pk1,pk2}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
.setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code}

Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in OrderByCompiler.compile, because 
{{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} is 
consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}}, so  the result of 
 {{OrderByCompiler.compile}} is {{OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY}}.

But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expression is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so we 
need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after
the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, for the new 
GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual 
{{pk1,pk2}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(State

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, for the new 
GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual 
{{pk1,pk2}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
.setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code}

Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in OrderByCompiler.compile, because 
{{the GroupBy.isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} is 
consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}}, so  the result of 
 OrderByCompiler.compile is OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY.

But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expression is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so we 
need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after
the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, for the new 
GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual 
{{pk1,pk2}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementCont

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158, for the new 
GroupBy, the GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}},not the actual 
{{pk1,pk2}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
.setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code}

Then when we compile {{order by pk2,pk1}} in OrderByCompiler.compile, because 
{{the GroupBy. isOrderPreserving}} is true, and {{order by pk2,pk1}} is 
consistent with the GroupBy.expressions {{group by pk2,pk1}}, so  the result of 
 OrderByCompiler.compile is OrderBy.FWD_ROW_KEY_ORDER_BY.

But in fact,because the actual GroupBy.expression is {{group by pk1,pk2}},so we 
need to execute  {{order by pk2,pk1}} after
the {{group by pk1,pk2}}.

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158,for the new 
GroupBy, the  GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158,for the new 
GroupBy, the  GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving)
.setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code}

then when we compile 

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158,for the new 
GroupBy, the  GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158,for the new 
GroupBy, the  GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}}:

{code:java}
141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving).setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code:java}

then when we compile 

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158,for the new 
GroupBy, the  GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}}:
{code:java}
141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i+

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158,for the new 
GroupBy, the  GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}}:

{code}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving).setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code}

then when we compile 

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158,for the new 
GroupBy, the  GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}}:

{code:java}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
14

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158,for the new 
GroupBy, the  GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}}:

{code:java}

141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving).setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }

{code:java}

then when we compile 

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158,for the new 
GroupBy, the  GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}}:

{code:java}
141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size();

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

The problem is caused by the GroupBy.compile, obviously, in line 154, for 
{{group by pk2,pk1}},
{{OrderPreservingTracker.isOrderPreserving}} is true by reorder the {{pk2,pk1}} 
following the order of PK columns {{pk1,pk2}},  but in line 158,for the new 
GroupBy, the  GroupBy.expressions is still {{pk2,pk1}}:
{code:java}
141   public GroupBy compile(StatementContext context, TupleProjector 
tupleProjector) throws SQLException {
142  boolean isOrderPreserving = this.isOrderPreserving;
143  int orderPreservingColumnCount = 0;
144  if (isOrderPreserving) {
145OrderPreservingTracker tracker = new 
OrderPreservingTracker(context, GroupBy.EMPTY_GROUP_BY, Ordering.UNORDERED, 
expressions.size(), tupleProjector);
146  for (int i = 0; i < expressions.size(); i++) {
147Expression expression = expressions.get(i);
148tracker.track(expression);
149}
150
151// This is true if the GROUP BY is composed of only PK 
columns. We further check here that
152// there are no "gaps" in the PK columns positions used 
(i.e. we start with the first PK
153// column and use each subsequent one in PK order).
154isOrderPreserving = tracker.isOrderPreserving();
155orderPreservingColumnCount = 
tracker.getOrderPreservingColumnCount();
156}
157if (isOrderPreserving || isUngroupedAggregate) {
158return new 
GroupBy.GroupByBuilder(this).setIsOrderPreserving(isOrderPreserving).setOrderPreservingColumnCount(orderPreservingColumnCount).build();
159 }
{code:java}

then when we compile 

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}


> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.13.2
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 1

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Affects Version/s: 4.13.2

> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.13.2
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 2| 3| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
+--+--+---+
| PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
+--+--+---+
| 8| 1| 1 |
| 9| 1| 1 |
| 3| 2| 1 |
| 7| 2| 1 |
| 2| 3| 1 |
+--+--+---+
{code}

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
 231
 321
 721
 811
 911
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
   
{code}


> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
> +--+--+---+
> | PK2  | PK1  | COUNT(V)  |
> +--+--+---+
> | 8| 1| 1 |
> | 9| 1| 1 |
> | 3| 2| 1 |
> | 7| 2| 1 |
> | 2| 3| 1 |
> +--+--+---+
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
+--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
 231
 321
 721
 811
 911
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
   
{code}

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
   +--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
 231
 321
 721
 811
 911
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
   
{code}


> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
> +--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
>  231
>  321
>  721
>  811
>  911
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
>
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
   +--+--+-+
| PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
+--+--+-+
| 1| 8| 10  |
| 1| 9| 11  |
| 2| 3| 13  |
| 2| 7| 15  |
| 3| 2| 17  |
+--+--+-+
{code}

for following sql :
{code}
select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
{code}

the expected result is :
{code}
 231
 321
 721
 811
 911
{code}

but the actual result is :
{code}
   
{code}

  was:
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
   upsert into test values(1,8,10)
   upsert into test values(1,9,11)
   upsert into test values(2,3,12)
   upsert into test values(2,7,13)
   upsert into test values(3,2,14)
{code}


> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
>+--+--+-+
> | PK1  | PK2  |  V  |
> +--+--+-+
> | 1| 8| 10  |
> | 1| 9| 11  |
> | 2| 3| 13  |
> | 2| 7| 15  |
> | 3| 2| 17  |
> +--+--+-+
> {code}
> for following sql :
> {code}
> select pk2,pk1,count(v) from test group by pk2,pk1 order by pk2,pk1
> {code}
> the expected result is :
> {code}
>  231
>  321
>  721
>  811
>  911
> {code}
> but the actual result is :
> {code}
>
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :
{code}
 create table test ( 
   pk1 integer not null , 
   pk2 integer not null, 
   v integer, 
   CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
{code}

and some data:
{code}
   upsert into test values(1,8,10)
   upsert into test values(1,9,11)
   upsert into test values(2,3,12)
   upsert into test values(2,7,13)
   upsert into test values(3,2,14)
{code}

  was:
Given a table :

 create table test ( 
" pk1 integer not null , " +
" pk2 integer not null, " +
" v integer, " +
" CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))";



> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
>
> Given a table :
> {code}
>  create table test ( 
>pk1 integer not null , 
>pk2 integer not null, 
>v integer, 
>CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))
> {code}
> and some data:
> {code}
>upsert into test values(1,8,10)
>upsert into test values(1,9,11)
>upsert into test values(2,3,12)
>upsert into test values(2,7,13)
>upsert into test values(3,2,14)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

2018-04-14 Thread chenglei (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chenglei updated PHOENIX-4690:
--
Description: 
Given a table :

 create table test ( 
" pk1 integer not null , " +
" pk2 integer not null, " +
" v integer, " +
" CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))";


> GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is 
> orderPreserving
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4690
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: chenglei
>Priority: Critical
>
> Given a table :
>  create table test ( 
> " pk1 integer not null , " +
> " pk2 integer not null, " +
> " v integer, " +
> " CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (pk1,pk2))";



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-4690) GroupBy expressions should follow the order of PK Columns if GroupBy is orderPreserving

26 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information