Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1

2018-05-31 Thread James Taylor
-1 due to PHOENIX-4759. The SYSTEM.CATALOG region getting stuck in RIT would be disastrous. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 > > Checked sums and signatures: ok > RAT check passes (0.98, 1.3, 1.4): ok > Built from source (0.98, 1.3, 1.4): ok > ​Unit tests pass (0.98):

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1

2018-05-30 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 Checked sums and signatures: ok RAT check passes (0.98, 1.3, 1.4): ok Built from source (0.98, 1.3, 1.4): ok ​Unit tests pass (0.98): ok, with two flakes: ​PhoenixQueryTimeoutIT and OctetLengthFunctionEnd2EndIT ​Unit tests pass (1.3): ok​ On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 2:55 PM, James Taylor wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1

2018-05-30 Thread Sergey Soldatov
0 We have a blocker for 5.x branch (PHOENIX-4759). It's a similar to PHOENIX-4719 lockup in static code during classloading. Root cause - introducing ConnectionFactory in PHOENIX-4685, so it might affect master branch as well. If nobody else saw problems with cluster restart (For 5.x branch we

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1

2018-05-30 Thread Mujtaba Chohan
+1. Verified backward compatibility and perf. to be on par with previous release (0.98 branch). On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Pedro Boado wrote: > +1 > > Tested (installed from parcels) in CDH 5.11.2 updating from Phoenix 4.13.2 > to 4.14.0 (basic table operation seems fine, no issues

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1

2018-05-30 Thread Pedro Boado
+1 Tested (installed from parcels) in CDH 5.11.2 updating from Phoenix 4.13.2 to 4.14.0 (basic table operation seems fine, no issues found) and also a clean install in clusters running CDH 5.12, 5.13 and 5.14 ( also with basic table operations ). Built from sources with all IT passing in all CDH

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1

2018-05-30 Thread Josh Elser
+1 (binding) Disclaimer: I only looked at the source releases. Too many other convenience binaries to pull it all down and validate individually. * hbase-1.1 had a slightly different xsum (.sha instead of .sha256 and .sha512) -- not sure if this was just caused by a human * xsums/sigs all

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1

2018-05-30 Thread Vincent Poon
+1 Ran a test driver against a local instance which does concurrent batch upserts to an indexed table. Everything looked fine. On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Thomas D'Silva wrote: > +1 > > Successfully built from source and was able run all UTs/ITs. > > On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 2:55 PM, James

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1

2018-05-29 Thread Thomas D'Silva
+1 Successfully built from source and was able run all UTs/ITs. On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 2:55 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1. This is a patch > release of Phoenix 4.14 and is compatible with Apache HBase 0.98, 1.1, 1.2, >

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1

2018-05-27 Thread James Taylor
Hello Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC1. This is a patch release of Phoenix 4.14 and is compatible with Apache HBase 0.98, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and CDH 5.11, 5.12, 5.13, and 5.14. The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary release for