Issue Subscription
Filter: PIG patch available (8 issues)
Subscriber: pigdaily
Key Summary
PIG-3592Should not try to create success file for non-fs schemes like hbase
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3592
PIG-3587add functionality for rolling over dates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13836138#comment-13836138
]
Cheolsoo Park edited comment on PIG-3585 at 12/1/13 11:13 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cheolsoo Park updated PIG-3585:
---
Attachment: PIG-3585-2.patch
One minor clean-up. I made getPackage() take multiple inputs as parameter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cheolsoo Park updated PIG-3585:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Committed to tez branch.
> Make uni
> On Dec. 1, 2013, 5:06 p.m., Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
> > The code is fine if we have union after some processing. But for simple
> > load and union case as below, this will create 3 vertices - 2 load vertices
> > and one union vertex.
> >
> > a = load 'a'
> > b = load 'b'
> > c = union a,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13836119#comment-13836119
]
Cheolsoo Park commented on PIG-3585:
Yes, it should be possible. Alternatively, I am thi
> On Dec. 1, 2013, 5:06 p.m., Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
> > The code is fine if we have union after some processing. But for simple
> > load and union case as below, this will create 3 vertices - 2 load vertices
> > and one union vertex.
> >
> > a = load 'a'
> > b = load 'b'
> > c = union a,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13836074#comment-13836074
]
Rohini Palaniswamy commented on PIG-3585:
-
+1. The code is good if we have union aft
> On Dec. 1, 2013, 5:06 p.m., Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
> > The code is fine if we have union after some processing. But for simple
> > load and union case as below, this will create 3 vertices - 2 load vertices
> > and one union vertex.
> >
> > a = load 'a'
> > b = load 'b'
> > c = union a,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15931/#review29567
---
Ship it!
The code is fine if we have union after some processing. B
10 matches
Mail list logo