With 3 binding +1 (Alan, Thejas and I) and 3 non-binding +1 (Rohini,
Jarek and Cheolsoo), the vote pass. I will start the release process.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Cheolsoo Park cheol...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1.
Tested against hadoop 1.0.x and 2.0.x clusters.
On Fri,
+1.
Tested against hadoop 1.0.x and 2.0.x clusters.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.orgwrote:
+1 (non-binding)
* Verified checksum
* Verified signatures
* Tests seems to be passing
* Checked top level files (NOTICE, LICENSE)
Note:
I personally prefer
+1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests, piggybank
unit tests, checked docs/release notes, ran a simple script locally and
against a cluster.
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1, yet again :). Checked the key signature and
+1
Verified md5 checksums of src and binary tar.gz .
Build the src tar.gz and ran queries against a hadoop 1.1 cluster, ran
fs and sh commands.
-Thejas
On 1/3/13 12:11 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
+1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests, piggybank
unit tests,
+1, yet again :). Checked the key signature and checksum on the source
package. Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in local
mode. Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster mode.
Alan.
On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
Hi,
I have
Hi,
I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance
release of Pig 0.10.
Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
Please download, test, and try it out:
http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/