On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Suneel Marthi
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Ellison Anne Williams <
> eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, as per http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html --
>>
>> The code falls under ECCN 5D002, so we are good there.
>>
>> We need to:
>>
>> (1
GitHub user smarthi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/79
Removed the and entries
Please see the updated settings.xml (1) that needs to be local to all
Release Managers to enable deployment of artifacts to staging
1. https://gist.github.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, as per http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html --
>
> The code falls under ECCN 5D002, so we are good there.
>
> We need to:
>
> (1) Notify the USG via the sending the specified email
>
> (2) Add a READM
Yes, as per http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html --
The code falls under ECCN 5D002, so we are good there.
We need to:
(1) Notify the USG via the sending the specified email
(2) Add a README containing the crypto -- Do we have to go through the
entire voting process again internally since we a
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Got it - will take care of it tonight/in the morning and report back to
> general@incubator
>
> I'd better notify the USG of the crypto - lol :)
>
That's the part that had me laughing, all of this source c
Got it - will take care of it tonight/in the morning and report back to
general@incubator
I'd better notify the USG of the crypto - lol :)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Suneel Marthi
wrote:
> Fyi folks
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Justin Mclean
> Date: Wed, Aug 24,
Fyi folks
-- Forwarded message --
From: Justin Mclean
Date: Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
-1 binding, willing to change my vote if encryption code issue clarified.
> The artifacts can
Email sent to general@incubator to call the vote. Please follow the vote
thread there. Thanks!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ellison Anne Williams
Date: Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:16 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
Hi All,
Th
yeah, ur session times out after 'x' minutes of inactivity like any Regular
Web application
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like my creds had expired although I was still logged in - logging
> out and back in again, I was able to
Looks like my creds had expired although I was still logged in - logging
out and back in again, I was able to delete. I will clean it up and send
out an email to general@incubator
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Suneel Marthi
wrote:
> Seems like Nexus does allow deleting from Staging repo, it
Seems like Nexus does allow deleting from Staging repo, it just worked when
I tried deleting a sha1.
@EllisonAnne u shuld be able to purge the irrelevant artifacts from Nexus
and finalize the release.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No
I can confirm that its not possible to delete artifacts from staging.
So the next steps:
Would IPMC vote on the present staging artifacts?
or
Do we make a release and present that for IPMC vote ?
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Suneel Marthi
wrote:
> The other option is a little hacky way
The other option is a little hacky way via SVN. I know it works for pushing
artifacts to mirror, but never had to try it on staging.
Will give it a quick try now, I am on slack if u would like to talk thru.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
No dice on deletion of artifacts in a closed repo (shocking, I know...). We
will have to go with our current repo. Sorry for the noise!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I took a look and it seemed that 'Download' and 'Delete' were still
Hi,
It's been 72 hours, so the Pirk 0.1.0 release vote in now closed.
The vote passed as followsL
7 +1 (binding) votes
0 -1 votes
We now need to call a vote on general@incubator.
Thanks!
Ellison Anne
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Jacob Wilder <
jacobwilder.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
I took a look and it seemed that 'Download' and 'Delete' were still right
click options on each of the files in the Nexus repo. I've never tried it,
so it may be a mirage, but it would clean things up for the IPMC vote if
it's possible.
Yes, I will go ahead and close the vote (I was going to wait
You may want to close the Vote summarizing the results, since its been > 72
hrs.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since we have to conduct a release vote with the IPMC, I would like to
> clean our Nexus repo to only include the *-source-
+1 to this, but can this be done in staging ? I know that one could cherry
pick artifacts to be published to the mirrors at Release time.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since we have to conduct a release vote with the IPMC, I would lik
Since we have to conduct a release vote with the IPMC, I would like to
clean our Nexus repo to only include the *-source-release.zip* files as
those are the only ones that we are considering for our first release.
Please let me know if you have any concerns.
Thanks!
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/78
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
On 23/08/16 17:42, Josh Elser wrote:
> Oh, either it doesn't list yourself as an admin when you look at it, or
> you goofed adding me, Joe :)
>
> I see Tim and Joe in the list, but don't see myself (or the ability to
> add Suneel).
Your admin bit was not set Josh.
So now we have the following pe
21 matches
Mail list logo
