Ok, each project does it a little different.
Cool, we'll leave POM as it now.
Filing an Infra ticket now to purge the release artifacts.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> i don't believe that would be necessary. Here is the entirety of my
> maven settings
I had the real apache repo URL in POM as opposed to the staging URL. So
that completely bypassed staging.
If I am understanding correctly, we need to add the Parent POM and remove
from POM - the later should be specified in
settings.xml. Agree?
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Joe Witt
Yep - that did it - thanks!
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Suneel Marthi
wrote:
> You should use -Psigned_release.
>
> Once u r past release:prepare and release:perform and u need to rollback.
>
> -- run mvn -Psigned_release release:rollback
> mvn
One quick thing I noticed is it doesn't look like we're using the
apache parent pom. That helps a lot.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> One other thing we need to figure out for next release. You shouldn't have
> to specify the repository info in
One other thing we need to figure out for next release. You shouldn't have
to specify the repository info in POM, its best
done in settings.xml (that's how we do it on Mahout). I tried doing it that
way but it didn't work for whatever reason and I ended up explicitly
declaring that in POM.
On