Re: Recursive svn add?

2010-06-16 Thread Mike Smorul
find ./ -name \*.bxml -exec svn add {} \; On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Greg Brown wrote: > Anyone know if it is possible to do a recursive add in SVN? I would have > thought this would work but it doesn't seem to: > >  svn add *.bxml > > This doesn't work either: > >  svn add --depth=infini

Re: Pivot 1.6->2.0

2010-06-17 Thread Mike Smorul
Would it be feasible to release a pivot-compat.jar that could include support for older wtkx files while still making it pretty clear this is not standard? On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Greg Brown wrote: > Yeah, OK. The main problem is that many developers aren't going to read the > release

Re: Rebranding

2011-01-07 Thread Mike Smorul
>> >> To be clear - these are things that developers are interested in that Pivot >> does not currently address well, or at all. These are not the only use cases >> we should be targeting - Pivot's primary value is still as a general-purpose >> Java-based user interface toolkit. > > > I tend to

Re: Rebranding

2011-01-07 Thread Mike Smorul
> > Good point. Pivot is good for prototyping. But does that mean that you use > Pivot to build a prototype and then something else to build the actual > solution? If so, why? > I tend to keep the finished product in pivot as well since it's pretty trivial to move to real models/data instead of

Re: [jira] Commented: (PIVOT-393) Certain UI components do not properly respect system text anti-aliasing hints

2010-04-15 Thread Mike Smorul
It looks correct as far as I can tell. Do you have a reference screenshot that I could compare against? On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Greg Brown (JIRA) wrote: > >    [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focu

Re: [jira] Commented: (PIVOT-393) Certain UI components do not properly respect system text anti-aliasing hints

2010-04-15 Thread Mike Smorul
by running the > 1.4 version here: > > http://pivot.apache.org/demos/kitchen-sink.html > > > On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Mike Smorul wrote: > >> It looks correct as far as I can tell. Do you have a reference >> screenshot that I could compare against? >> >&