Hi all,
I agree ... that's even better. As this has the "active" counterpart.
So we could talk about "active drivers" and "passive drivers".
I just had my magazine article updated accordingly __
Chris
Am 06.11.18, 19:50 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" :
Ah, too slow... I also Suggest passive :)
Ah, too slow... I also Suggest passive :)
From: Otto Fowler
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 7:08:41 PM
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org; Christofer Dutz
Subject: Re: Better name for "Promiscuous Mode Drivers"
Passive?
On November 6, 2018 at 11:46:13, Christofer Dutz (ch
Passive?
On November 6, 2018 at 11:46:13, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
as I’m probably going to be implement the first PLC4X driver in a
non-invasive way, I was thinking about the naming.
Initially I talked about this mode as “Promiscuous Mode Driver” as it
operate
Hi all,
as I’m probably going to be implement the first PLC4X driver in a non-invasive
way, I was thinking about the naming.
Initially I talked about this mode as “Promiscuous Mode Driver” as it operates
by using a network devices “promiscuous mode” where it reads all Ethernet
traffic and not o
