[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [190]'

BUILD-STABLE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [190]': Is back to normal.

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

Hi, A -1 vote on a release is not a veto, you should wait and see what other PPMC members think, you can also try and convince the person to change their vote. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

Hi, > I just checked the RELEASE_NOTES and saw that I never changed the > "(Unreleased) 0.3.0". > Is this a problem for the release and does this justify -1 vote? No a hug issue IMO, just fix it in the next release. Thanks, Justin

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [189]'

BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [189]': Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/189/";>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [189]"

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [188]'

BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [188]': Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/188/";>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [188]"

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

Hi Chris, thanks for your feedback. So I'll close the vote here and prepare an rc2 and start a new vote than. Best! Julian Am 24.01.19, 15:40 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : -1 (binding) chris The RELEASE_NOTES don't reference the proper release version and it contains the prefix "(U

Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

-1 (binding) chris The RELEASE_NOTES don't reference the proper release version and it contains the prefix "(Unreleased)". Besides this, I did the full check: - tools/download_staged_release.sh 0.3.0 1 (Downloaded and verified, after I removed the download of MD5 which we removed in the last re

[DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread. Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes. If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and then take the details to this thread. Julian

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

Hi all, I just checked the RELEASE_NOTES and saw that I never changed the "(Unreleased) 0.3.0". Is this a problem for the release and does this justify -1 vote? Are there any (written-down) rules for that? Julian Am 24.01.19, 14:47 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : This is the discussion thread

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

Yup ... just wanted to report that too ... Chris Am 24.01.19, 14:54 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi all, I just checked the RELEASE_NOTES and saw that I never changed the "(Unreleased) 0.3.0". Is this a problem for the release and does this justify -1 vote? Are there any (

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

But I would let us finish the check, if we are to find anything else ... Chris Am 24.01.19, 15:02 schrieb "Otto Fowler" : I think you should fail with a -1 and cut a new RC with the right notes. On January 24, 2019 at 08:54:18, Julian Feinauer ( j.feina...@pragmaticminds.d

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

I think you should fail with a -1 and cut a new RC with the right notes. On January 24, 2019 at 08:54:18, Julian Feinauer ( j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de) wrote: Hi all, I just checked the RELEASE_NOTES and saw that I never changed the "(Unreleased) 0.3.0". Is this a problem for the release and

[VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to vote on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [1]. If approved we will seek final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +