[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [94]'

BUILD-STABLE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [94]': Is back to normal.

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [93]'

BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [93]': Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/93/;>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [93]"

Re: Registration on the PLC4X website

Hi Chris, Done with option a) Lukas Am Fr., 16. Okt. 2020 um 16:32 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi Lukas ... > > Just in case you didn't see it: > > [WARNING] Files with unapproved licenses: > >

Re: Registration on the PLC4X website

Hi Lukas ... Just in case you didn't see it: [WARNING] Files with unapproved licenses: src/site/resources/images/users/companies/logo_record_evolution_single_dark_bgfont.svg Could you please do one of the following: a) Replace the SVG with a PNG b) Ask if we can get a version with an

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [92]'

BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [92]': Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/92/;>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [92]"

Re: Registration on the PLC4X website

Hi all, Thanks @Chris and @Katharina I edited the adopters page (added Record Evolution) and added the Record Evolution Logo to our git repository. https://github.com/apache/plc4x/blob/develop/src/site/asciidoc/users/adopters.adoc Once again thank you :) Kind regards Lukas Am Fr., 16. Okt.

Re: Registration on the PLC4X website

Hi Lukas, Katharina approached me directly and I asked her to send the information to this list. I do know that PRs might sort of be a challenge for non-developers, so I thought if the request goes to this list, It's on officially on file too, which should be enough. Unfortunately the

Re: Registration on the PLC4X website

Hi Katharina, That is completely fine for us. Can you do a pull-request on Github: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/blob/develop/src/site/asciidoc/users/adopters.adoc and add Record Evolution via Pull request in the adoc-file. This is our way to go - so we have a recorded confirmation - that you

Registration on the PLC4X website

Hello everyone, I am writing to you because of your list of companies using Apache PLC4X and wanted to ask if you could add Record Evolution GmbH. I checked your current list and you can find the according information on Record Evolution below: You can find the Record Evolution *logo* attached

[GitHub] [plc4x] hutcheb merged pull request #194: Add an OPC UA Server

hutcheb merged pull request #194: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/194 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

[GitHub] [plc4x] chrisdutz merged pull request #192: Refactor Field Handler Classes

chrisdutz merged pull request #192: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/192 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

Re: PlcValues ... especially the Bit-String types

Hi Ben ... So do you want to merge your PR? It would really be useful to have that stuff in develop ... Chris Am 16.10.20, 10:16 schrieb "Ben Hutcheson" : Hi Chris, I have included a getBooleanArray() in each of the PlcBYTE, WORD, DWORD and LWORD classes. The refactor PR

Re: PlcValues ... especially the Bit-String types

Hi Chris, I have included a getBooleanArray() in each of the PlcBYTE, WORD, DWORD and LWORD classes. The refactor PR should be ready. Adding getBitLength and getBit methods seem like they could be useful. kind Regards Ben On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 3:44 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > >

PlcValues ... especially the Bit-String types

Hi all, I’m currently working on porting the PlcValues to Go and here just stumbled over something. The PlcBYTE, PlcWORD, PlcDWORD seem to be integer values and not allow accessing the bool values as bit-fields. I know Ben is still working on his improvements … will this be covered here? Do

Re: [DISCUSS] Move the xml files for the parser/serializer tests and the driver integration tests into the protocol modules?

Hi Folks, so in the plc4go branch I did the changes and all of the adjustments in the tests this change needed. In the end it seems I needed to go down the "test-jar" path as "provided" resources don't seem to be included in the default classpath and I therefore couldn't load them. But with

Re: [DISCUSS] Enriched driver context for plc4j

Hi Lukasz, could you possibly whip up a proposal in a branch ... I have to admit I don't quite understand the problem you're trying to solve. Perhaps being able to see what changes you propose makes this easier? Chris Am 14.10.20, 18:19 schrieb "Łukasz Dywicki" : Hey all, I have a

Re: PlcConnection isConnected returns true

This is another reason I would really like to get rid of netty ... it's no longer doing very much in our drivers (is more a relic from the pre 0.7-times). I think as soon as I have the SPI working for Go we could think of back porting that structure to Java and to eliminate Netty all together.