yes
Am Mi., 2. Dez. 2020 um 22:43 Uhr schrieb Otto Fowler <
ottobackwa...@gmail.com>:
> you mean build tools?
>
> From: Lukas Ott
> Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
> Date: December 2, 2020 at 15:01:21
> To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC1
>
> This is the
-1 (binding)
the release notes at the top level and in the package have no information
for this release.
- also: The readme doesn’t specify the versions of:
java
maven
That are supported and should be used.
From: Christofer Dutz
Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Date: December 2, 2020 at
you mean build tools?
From: Lukas Ott
Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Date: December 2, 2020 at 15:01:21
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC1
This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the
+1 (binding)
Chris
[OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote
email
[MINOR] Verify the signature is correct
[OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address.
[OK] Verify the SHA512 hashes
[OK] Unzip the archive
[OK] Verify the existence of
Here are the ones Nexus asked for:
1) pool.sks-keyservers.net
2) keyserver.ubuntu.com
Cheers,
Lukas
This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
then take the details to this thread.
Message:
Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Code-Generation 1.4.0 has been staged under [2]
and it’s time to vote on accepting it for release.
All Maven artifacts are available under [1]. Voting will be open for
72hr.
A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1
Hi Niclas,
thanks for that insight. And I generally agree with all.
But I also think not only board members read these reports (at least I
sometimes read the ones of projects I’m just interested in) … and if you put
hard work into something, I think being mentioned in a report is also some
foxpluto opened a new pull request #209:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/209
Hi,
I have tried to summarise the experience I did using the Cached pool2
library Julian wrote for Plc4x.
Merge with the code if you think this could be helpful.
Regards,
S.
Perhaps I can give insight to how (at least) this Board member view reports;
1. Whether or not there is life in the project,
a. that stuff happens on dev@ mailing list
b. releases are progressing "normally" (can vary from quarterly to every
other year)
2. Ensure that there is no friction
I would say “a lot of initiatives been worked on” instead of “done"
From: Christofer Dutz
Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Date: December 2, 2020 at 06:09:09
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: AW: [DRAFT] Borad Report
Hey chris …
And you missed the work on the CAN driver.
….
Von: Christofer
BUILD-STABLE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [132]':
Is back to normal.
Hey chris …
And you missed the work on the CAN driver.
….
Von: Christofer Dutz
Datum: Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2020 um 11:12
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [DRAFT] Borad Report
Hey Chris …
you missed mentioning our Community Calls (Which actually should be one today
too)
;-)
Von:
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [131]':
Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/131/;>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop
[develop] [131]"
hutcheb merged pull request #208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/208
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
Hey Chris …
you missed mentioning our Community Calls (Which actually should be one today
too)
;-)
Von: Christofer Dutz
Datum: Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2020 um 11:08
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: [DRAFT] Borad Report
Hi all,
I just whipped up our board report … If I missed anything
Hi all,
I just whipped up our board report … If I missed anything important, please
mention this (Ideally just post what you would like added/changed/removed
instead of changing it inline (I don’t want to miss anything).
I hope I didn’t miss any features and initiatives … if I did, this wasn’t
17 matches
Mail list logo
