Re: DF1 protocol ...cant find documentation

2021-03-16 Thread Stephen Snow
Hello Gaurav, The Rockwell Automation DF1 protocol manual, publication # 1770-rm516_- en-p.pdf is freely downloadable and indeed searchable via google/duck duck go/others. Just did it myself. Regards, Stephen On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 22:13 +0530, Gaurav P wrote: > Thanks ChrisI want to

Re: DF1 protocol ...cant find documentation

2021-03-16 Thread Gaurav P
Thanks ChrisI want to generate output of command to read and write in plc 5 register in hex which I can send over serial via some tool like hyperterminal and verify in ladders On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, 18:26 Christofer Dutz, wrote: > Hi Gaurav, > > yes, the driver sources are there and the

[GitHub] [plc4x] chrisdutz merged pull request #228: added strtok_s define for windows

2021-03-16 Thread GitBox
chrisdutz merged pull request #228: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/228 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [plc4x] thomas169 commented on pull request #228: added strtok_s define for windows

2021-03-16 Thread GitBox
thomas169 commented on pull request #228: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/228#issuecomment-800371017 Thanks, hopefully I will help out a bit more, certainly will if we start using PLC4x. Yes, its effectively 0 change on windows (after preprocessor anyway) and a small fix

[GitHub] [plc4x] chrisdutz commented on pull request #228: added strtok_s define for windows

2021-03-16 Thread GitBox
chrisdutz commented on pull request #228: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/228#issuecomment-800367010 No worries ... I was just confused as you wrote what you did, but not why ;-) We're always happy about getting new PRs from new folks ... so first off all: Welcome :-)

[GitHub] [plc4x] thomas169 commented on pull request #228: added strtok_s define for windows

2021-03-16 Thread GitBox
thomas169 commented on pull request #228: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/228#issuecomment-800363768 Apologies, (but go easy was my first ever PR :) ). Yes allows hello world s7 to link without error on Linux This

[GitHub] [plc4x] chrisdutz commented on pull request #228: added strtok_s define for windows

2021-03-16 Thread GitBox
chrisdutz commented on pull request #228: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/228#issuecomment-800361785 So this fixes a problem using the code on non-windows system? Had to do a little research to what this PR is about. A bit of context would have been helpful ;-)

[GitHub] [plc4x] thomas169 opened a new pull request #228: added strtok_s define for windows

2021-03-16 Thread GitBox
thomas169 opened a new pull request #228: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/228 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

AW: DF1 protocol ...cant find documentation

2021-03-16 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Gaurav, yes, the driver sources are there and the protocol sources, used for code generation are here: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/develop/protocols/df1 Just ask, if you need any help. Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Gaurav P Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. März 2021 12:11

Re: DF1 protocol ...cant find documentation

2021-03-16 Thread Gaurav P
Thanks Looks I would need to modify source DF1 driver ... is the latest source is at : https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/develop/sandbox/test-java-df1-driver ? or somewhere else On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 5:09 PM Christofer Dutz wrote: > HI Gaurav, > > I would probably use a byte-array field,

Re: PROFIBUS driver?

2021-03-16 Thread Łukasz Dywicki
I don't know much of profibus (yet) and miss test hardware, but it seems to rather have descending adoption, isn't it? >From what I recall its communication medium is compatible with EIA-485 and have typical serial bus characteristics. Do you happen to know converters/hardware which can create an

AW: PROFIBUS driver?

2021-03-16 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Andreas, let me also jump into the discussion here. We will probably not support ProfiBus in PLC4X. In contrast to ProfiNet, which is ethernet-based, ProfiBus requires dedicated hardware for which dedicated drivers are needed. This would mean that we would need to implement a transport

Re: PROFIBUS driver?

2021-03-16 Thread Lukas Ott
Yes, the whole idea of PLC4X is to support as much as possible. The limitation are ressources: - Budget so that the developer gets paid - Time so if you or someone else wants to develop a driver do not hesitate to ask and just do it - Access to devices and / or manuals for the specific protocol