Re: [DISCUSS] SingletonTransports?

2023-05-15 Thread Cesar Garcia
Hello everyone, This point is extremely interesting in the way of developing high availability or multiprotocol drivers. A long long time ago we developed a driver for a telecommunications company, it used Kannel as a base, a communications gateway, but what I bring to this point is the concept

Re: AW: [Opinion] NiFi integration Listener

2023-05-15 Thread Otto Fowler
>From a Nifi point of view, having possibly many background threads that are not in the thread pools and governed by the Nifi scheduler is a bad idea, I *think*. I would recommend that you take to the [nifi dev mailing list or slack]( https://nifi.apache.org/mailing_lists.html) for further

Re: [DISCUSS] Add GitHub Discussions?

2023-05-15 Thread Otto Fowler
+1 On May 15, 2023 at 10:39:41 AM, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de) wrote: Hi all, So, my PR for infra just got merged and we can now customize the auto-generated emails sent for GitHub Discussions … so now I would like to hear your thoughts on if we want to enable GitHub

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [1404]'

2023-05-15 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [1404]': Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/1404/;>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [1404]"

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [1403]'

2023-05-15 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [1403]': Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/1403/;>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [1403]"

Re: [DISCUSS] Add GitHub Discussions?

2023-05-15 Thread Sebastian Rühl
+1 sure go for it - Sebastian On 2023/05/15 14:39:27 Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > So, my PR for infra just got merged and we can now customize the > auto-generated emails sent for GitHub Discussions … so now I would like to > hear your thoughts on if we want to enable GitHub

Re: [DISCUSS] SingletonTransports?

2023-05-15 Thread Ben Hutcheson
Seems like a good idea. On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 10:28 am, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > while doing some brainstorming on my next steps for the PROFINET driver, I > fomulated something I would call a SingletonTransport … > We have some drivers, that require a connection to open a port on

Re: AW: [Opinion] NiFi integration Listener

2023-05-15 Thread Unai Leria
Hi again, I think even if the subscriptions would rely on internal polling a NiFi processor that gives access to subscription operation would be a nice addition to the integration. Furthermore we would be covering all operations except browsing (for which I don't see a use case in NiFi). I

Re: [DISCUSS] Add GitHub Discussions?

2023-05-15 Thread Ben Hutcheson
+1 I see no reason not to. On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 4:57 pm, Dominik Riemer wrote: > Hi, > +1…our experience at StreamPipes is that GitHub Discussions really help to > lower the entry barrier for new users to ask questions! > And questions are not asked twice ;-) > > Cheers > Dominik > > > Am

Re: [DISCUSS] Add GitHub Discussions?

2023-05-15 Thread Dominik Riemer
Hi, +1…our experience at StreamPipes is that GitHub Discussions really help to lower the entry barrier for new users to ask questions! And questions are not asked twice ;-) Cheers Dominik > Am 15.05.2023 um 16:39 schrieb Christofer Dutz : > > Hi all, > > So, my PR for infra just got merged

Re: [DISCUSS] Add GitHub Discussions?

2023-05-15 Thread Lukas Ott
Hi, I personally started using GitHub Discussions and I am really a fan of it as it seamlessly integrates with our code repository. Especially as Confluence is not so visible and the linking and switching from an article to an issue and vice versa. So I am in favor as well. Plus we would have

[DISCUSS] Add GitHub Discussions?

2023-05-15 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all, So, my PR for infra just got merged and we can now customize the auto-generated emails sent for GitHub Discussions … so now I would like to hear your thoughts on if we want to enable GitHub Discussions for PLC4X I would be in favor for it. Chris

Re: [PR] build(deps): bump build-helper-maven-plugin from 3.3.0 to 3.4.0 (plc4x)

2023-05-15 Thread via GitHub
sruehl merged PR #945: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/945 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@plc4x.apache.org

Re: [PR] build(deps): bump buildnumber-maven-plugin from 3.0.0 to 3.1.0 (plc4x)

2023-05-15 Thread via GitHub
sruehl merged PR #944: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/944 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@plc4x.apache.org

[DISCUSS] SingletonTransports?

2023-05-15 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all, while doing some brainstorming on my next steps for the PROFINET driver, I fomulated something I would call a SingletonTransport … We have some drivers, that require a connection to open a port on a given port number or open a raw socket. This doesn’t work with multiple connections. So