Re: [DISCUSS] Format for specifying "known messages"

2022-08-24 Thread Ben Hutcheson
Yeah I think it makes sense to use xml, considering that it’ll make it easy to generate from the existing tests. Would be interesting to use something like https://graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html so that we could more easily represent sequences. There’d also be a bunch of tools to visualise things

Re: [DISCUSS] Format for specifying "known messages"

2022-08-24 Thread Lukas Ott
I like that approach really much to leverage our existing XML unit tests for this kind of code generation. +1 Am Mi., 24. Aug. 2022 um 13:52 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Hi all, > > It’s getting more and more challenging to keep all of the driver types we > have in

[DISCUSS] Format for specifying "known messages"

2022-08-24 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all, It’s getting more and more challenging to keep all of the driver types we have in all the languages perfectly in-sync. So I’m thinking of starting the next step on generating more of the code. Right now I’d love to generate the construction of well known messages. As usually you have som