Julian Feinauer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Juli 2019 09:05
An: Strljic, Matthias Milan ;
dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] change connection string format
Hey Matthias,
Personally, I feel that it would be better for users to keep fields
"domain
close
the contents to any other person. Thank you.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Julian Feinauer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Juli 2019 09:05
An: Strljic, Matthias Milan ;
dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] change connection string format
Hey Matthias,
Personally, I feel that it w
Hey Matthias,
Personally, I feel that it would be better for users to keep fields "domain"
specific.
At least I love that for S7 (and our users too).
Perhaps we can introduce also a general unified language for that but
optionally provide a specific one for each protocol.
What do others think?
Hi Julian,
I think that is a really good question.
For the Connection String I would agree (+1) for your suggestion. But wanted to
ask if there is a notation which is domain specific to a protocol from the
"user" point of view?
Like we have it in the FieldAddresses.
So that we just throw into a
Hi Chris,
sure, sorry for that.
As some drivers have the possibility to add further configuration options I
would like to unify that for all drivers.
Camel uses the URI syntax for that, so e.g. for siemens one would write:
s7://192.168.1.10?rack=0&slot=0
or, if both have a default value of 0 (w
Hi Julian,
Could you post examples how the URLs would look like? Sorry, don't have the
time to read the document you posted. So if you would post example strings for
each driver type we currently have in plc4x, I think that would help us
understand your proposal.
Chris
Holen Sie sichOutlook f
