So I think we'll go with that version ...
So let's see where I have to put it __
Chris
Am 02.10.18, 14:41 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" :
Fine for me.
Am 02.10.18, 10:30 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
So how about this:
Fine for me.
Am 02.10.18, 10:30 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
So how about this:
---
Apache PLC4X (incubating)
PLC4X is a set of libraries for communicating with industrial
So how about this:
---
Apache PLC4X (incubating)
PLC4X is a set of libraries for communicating with industrial programmable
logic controllers (PLCs) using a variety of protocols but with a shared API.
Most
JulianFeinauer closed pull request #21: Made PlcInvalidFieldException.java
checked.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-plc4x/pull/21
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this
JulianFeinauer commented on issue #21: Made PlcInvalidFieldException.java
checked.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-plc4x/pull/21#issuecomment-426191726
Closing as suggested by sebastian.
But I definitly like to adress the topic nonetheless as we heavily depend on
user input
sruehl commented on issue #21: Made PlcInvalidFieldException.java checked.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-plc4x/pull/21#issuecomment-426188765
As I said: The annoyance to be forked to catch a exception would outweigh
the benefit. In the usual api use this would a
JulianFeinauer closed pull request #25: PLC4X-57 Bugfix
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-plc4x/pull/25
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a foreign pull request
Hi Justin,
thanks for that input .. you are absolutely right ... so here goes an updated
version ...
---
Apache PLC4X (incubating)
PLC4X is a set of libraries for communicating with industrial programmable
