Hi Lukasz,
I intentionally didn't mention the simulator, as I understood Peter, that he's
looking for something to run his PLC programs on for testing. Yes, the
simulator we have could be used to simulate being a PLC, but it can't actually
simulate the PLC itself. That's not the scope of that
I guess the title says it all.
Right now, you can only purchase stickers:
https://www.redbubble.com/de/shop/?query=PLC4X=search_box
Which is cool, but I'd love a Toddy-Hoodie ;-)
Chris
+1 for Toddy-Hoodie
Am Mi., 4. Mai 2022 um 09:35 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz <
christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
> I guess the title says it all.
>
> Right now, you can only purchase stickers:
> https://www.redbubble.com/de/shop/?query=PLC4X=search_box
>
> Which is cool, but I'd love a Toddy-Hoodie
Hey Chris,
Sorry for mixing authorship. I didn't check simulator since a while,
hence was not certain if its up to date.
My point is about reusing network layer which PLC4X provides in order to
simulate a device. This is how you normally interact with PLC so it is a
natural way to make an
Sorry, I forgot to answer in English, embarrassing
I also think this is a good choice.
Excuse me, is the following example with 17 bits a miscalculation?
5:BOOL: X (17 bit)
5:BOOL[5]: X (17 bit)
5.0:BOOL[5]: X (17 bit)
我也觉得这个选择挺好的.
请问下, 以下的示例有17个bit 是 写错了吗?
5:BOOL: X (17 bit)
5:BOOL[5]: X (17 bit)
5.0:BOOL[5]: X (17 bit)
5.3:BOOL[5]: 000X0 (17 bit)
5.14:BOOL[5]: 00XX(16 bit) XXX0 (16 bit)
另外, 还有一种情况, 我确认下,
