Hi Chris,
yes, I agree with you and also +1 do it in PLC4X.
You just sounded as if this would even be better from your perspective than in
Netty, so I explained it.
I don’t want to do this on my own or so... nah
J
Am 14.08.19, 12:13 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Hi Julian,
I
Hi Julian,
I agree, that having the netty team support that, would be the best option, but
as far as I understood you, they don't want to. So I thought that option would
be off the table.
I thought the options on the table were:
- You Maintain and Release it outside of Apache
- We create a
Hi Chris,
the main reason for me to "give it away" is the maintenance of the module.
As we did not shine in the past for our in-depth expertice of netty (not
looking at someone here...) it is a bit wanky and always in the danger of
becoming "abandoned" : )
Julian
Am 14.08.19, 12:04 schrieb
Hi Julian,
a strong +1 for keeping it here. For the raw socket stuff I think I had even
added the "raw-socket" module to "utils" which should become a netty transport
you could use outside of PLC4X.
And then a "plc4j-protocol-driver-base-raw-socket" which sort of is the glue to
bring that
Hi all,
As some of you may know (not sure if it was on the list) I hacked together a
bridge between Netty 4 and Serial Port connectivity.
I opened a discussion on the (somehow inofficial and half-deprecated) Netty dev
list and already got a response from Norman (main maintainer of Netty, I
