https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60967
Saikiran changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||saikiran...@gmail.com
OS|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60967
Bug ID: 60967
Summary: Excel file is corrupted and the complete data is
deleted from file
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Hi Andi,
I added a try/catch block (r1790904). In the catch block I apply win1252,
like we used to do. This reverts to our old behavior if there's a length
exception.
I'm still not happy with this hack, but I think we're doing better than we were
and we're good enough to go.
We also still
Thank you! I'm looking at a file from Dominik's updated links now.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Beeker [mailto:kiwiwi...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 7:03 PM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: Re: POI 3.16 Final?
Hi Tim,
I'm waiting for your go to start with the candidat
Hi Tim,
I'm waiting for your go to start with the candidate.
Not sure, if this of any help, but the property sets also contain a codepage
and this might help in guessing the codepage in HWPFOldDocument.guessCodePage().
Andi
On 10.04.2017 22:28, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I have now upd
Hi Tim,
I have now updated the results to include links to one sample file for each
failure in the rightmost column in the table, let me know if you need more
samples for certain failures, I can fairly easily pull them from the
database if needed.
Dominik.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Alliso
>Since it would be read-only, would it just be another option, instead of a
>full replacement?
Y, think of it like XSSF's eventusermodel. We define an interface for what a
user will have to react to, like XSSFSheetXMLHandler's SheetContentsHandler,
and we take care of the rest. You can see
Late to the party as I sift through my Spring Break email backlog.
Since it would be read-only, would it just be another option, instead of a
full replacement? Would the data model need to be more fully fleshed out
to support all the corners of the OOXML spec not currently represented?
Is there
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500
ricardo.martin.aguirre.sanc...@everis.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ricardo.mart
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
ricardo.martin.aguirre.sanc...@everis.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ricardo.mart
Thank you, Dominik!
Is there any way I can get the HWPFOld documents?
Also, are you able to tell which files are now going oom? Is that a fluke of
the run or is that a new bug?
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Stadler [mailto:dominik.stad...@gmx.at]
Sent: Sunday, April 9, 2017 2:14 P
The errors don't look like blockers to me, so I try to fix the Extractor
errors
tonight - if they are no-brainers - and build the release candidate
afterwards.
If they involve more substantial rework, I guess it's ok to release (the
candidate) without the fix.
Andi
--
View this message in cont
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040
--- Comment #8 from samson ---
Created attachment 34903
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34903&action=edit
ProposedSolution+UnitTest
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040
samson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #7 from samson ---
- I would
14 matches
Mail list logo