On 2018-02-07, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> The Apache POI PMC held a vote (
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/poi-dev/201802.mbox/%3ccabdjj56tn5hl_a+gadzd6bc4txxfuuph1ahyqhydowmkw+p...@mail.gmail.com%3e)
> and came to the conclusion that Gump does not provide enough value for
> us to keep pu
On 2016-10-23, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> Thanks for applying this quickly and fixing the missing import.
You're welcome. Most likely the import wasn't strictly necessary as
imports sometimes seem to work transitively in Python - I'm in no way a
Python developer myself.
> The run now finished afte
Hi Dominik
On 2016-10-20, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> Since some time one of the steps in the POI builds inside Gump is failing,
> see below. We think it is related to the 1 hour timeout that is applied by
> default.
Yes, looks that way.
> The step compiles a big number of files, but finishes in a
Dear POI devs
we'll soon reduce the set of projects built by Gump. We'll still build
all projects POI depends on and re-enable nagging for POI.
The only project depending on POI in Gump's current set is Tika and the
Tika devs aren't interested in Gump anymore. If you feel building Tika
is impor
On 2013-06-24, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Before we re-enable emails we'd like to know whether you are still
>> interested in the service Gump provides, so please tell us. :-)
> We are.
Noted, thanks.
> Is there any easy way to
Dear Community
Apache Gump builds some of your projects and it is quite possible you
don't know or have by now forgotten about it.
More than half a year ago a technical problem has forced us to turn off
emails on build failures as we would have been sending out lots of false
alarms.
Before we re
