[Bug 61349] Add more sanity checks for byte[] allocation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61349 Dominik Stadler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 61349] Add more sanity checks for byte[] allocation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61349 --- Comment #4 from Tim Allison --- Wow. Thank you, Dominik! I'm surprised there weren't more problems. In r1809623, I bumped the following to 10MB: PPDrawing PPDrawingGroup PlexOfCps ExOleObjStg ListLevel SoundData I

[Bug 61349] Add more sanity checks for byte[] allocation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61349 --- Comment #3 from Dominik Stadler --- I ran a regression test run with the new limitations. Out of 1.1 million documents only 80 differences occurred in 4.0.0 compared to 3.17. Out of these 19 were OOMs that

[Bug 61349] Add more sanity checks for byte[] allocation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61349 --- Comment #2 from Javen O'Neal --- Should we be making better use of the transient modifier when allocating performance-related data structures? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 61349] Add more sanity checks for byte[] allocation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61349 --- Comment #1 from Tim Allison --- r1809169 initial commit. I tried to avoid checks in "serialize()" methods on the theory that the object has already been collected, it should be good. I also avoided most checks where

[Bug 61349] Add more sanity checks for byte[] allocation

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61349 Dominik Stadler changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All -- You