https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62993
gallon.fi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62993
Axel Howind changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All
Hardware|PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62993
Axel Howind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36313|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62993
--- Comment #4 from Axel Howind ---
Sorry, it seems this patch introduces a regression that I didn't see because
Junit was broken on my machine (I opened Bug 62996 for that problem). Now that
Junit is up and running again, I will look into the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62993
--- Comment #3 from Axel Howind ---
Created attachment 36315
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36315=edit
Patch that fixes bug 62993
Patch to fix Bug 62993
`XSSFEvaluationSheet` uses an internal cache to speed up
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62993
--- Comment #2 from Axel Howind ---
It turns out that this probably not only affects SUMIF but possibly all
functions that operate on ranges. Bug is triggered when rows are added after
the first formula evaluation is done. I have prepared a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62993
--- Comment #1 from Axel Howind ---
Created attachment 36313
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36313=edit
JUnit test for this
The attachment contains a JUnit test case for this bug. I am unsure where this
should end up in