RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-19 Thread Andreas Beeker
From the release guide: Log into https://repository.apache.org/ and go to the "Staging Repositories" area. Find the "orgapachepoi" entry, check it has the right content, then Close the repository. When that completes, Release it.

RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-18 Thread Javen O'Neal
I still need to figure out how to deploy to dist/release and maven central. I will update that section of the release guide when I figure out what I need to do. On Nov 18, 2016 13:34, "kiwiwings" wrote: > Thank you Javen for rolling this release - it seemed to be quite smooth :) > > Andi > > > >

RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-18 Thread kiwiwings
Thank you Javen for rolling this release - it seemed to be quite smooth :) Andi -- View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-POI-3-16-beta1-release-RC1-tp5725616p5725696.html Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-17 Thread Javen O'Neal
g.wool...@gmail.com>] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 4:46 PM To: POI Developers List mailto:dev@poi.apache.org>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1) +1 from me. Tested this build with a complex app compiled against 3.15, and don't see any issues.

RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-16 Thread Allison, Timothy B.
Woolsey [mailto:greg.wool...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 4:46 PM To: POI Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1) +1 from me. Tested this build with a complex app compiled against 3.15, and don't see any issues. Greg TL/DR Tested with an app

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-16 Thread Javen O'Neal
I met Clint Adams at PyCon US in July at a mini-keysigning party, but he hasn't signed my key yet. I should bug him again and exchange keys with more people on biglumber and Apache committers map. Nick Burch is 3 signatures away from Clint Adams. https://pgp.cs.uu.nl/paths/D84E41AE/to/B0AE9A02.htm

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-15 Thread David North
Hi Javen, Thanks for taking on this release. Hopefully I'll have time to try it against our big POI-using projects at work a bit later today. Meanwhile, it would be good if we could strengthen your PGP key's ties to the web of trust - at the moment, you, Dominik and Andreas have signed each other

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-15 Thread Javen O'Neal
Glad to hear you found no binary incompatibility issues. On Nov 15, 2016 1:45 PM, "Greg Woolsey" wrote: > +1 from me. Tested this build with a complex app compiled against 3.15, > and don't see any issues. > > Greg > > TL/DR > Tested with an app built using Vaadin 7.6.6, with Vaadin Spreadsheet

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-15 Thread Greg Woolsey
+1 from me. Tested this build with a complex app compiled against 3.15, and don't see any issues. Greg TL/DR Tested with an app built using Vaadin 7.6.6, with Vaadin Spreadsheet 1.3.0-alpha1, loading and manipulating XLSX files with tables, formatting, conditional formatting, pivots, charts, and

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-14 Thread Javen O'Neal
+1 from me. On Nov 14, 2016 1:27 PM, "Dominik Stadler" wrote: > Hi, > > Regression testing looks also good, no new failure at all, details at > http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/ and > http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reportsAll/ > > Dominik. > > On Mon, Nov

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-14 Thread Dominik Stadler
Hi, Regression testing looks also good, no new failure at all, details at http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/ and http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reportsAll/ Dominik. On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > +1 > > Yegor > > On Sun, Nov 13, 20

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-14 Thread Yegor Kozlov
+1 Yegor On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Javen O'Neal wrote: > Hallo, > > I have prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.16-beta1 (RC1). > > Copied from the new summary section in the changelog [1], the most > notable changes in this release are: > > - Initial work on adding a Gradl

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-14 Thread Dominik Stadler
Hi, It only happens when building the released source package, not the SVN checkout because some files from SVN are missing in the .zip/tar.gz package. Dominik. On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Javen O'Neal wrote: > > One thing that I found is that Ant-target "assemble" fails now because we >

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-13 Thread Javen O'Neal
> In the release note the "... password ..." line should be replaced by: ... Updated changelog in r1769570 [1] Updated release notes in r16986 [2] [1] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1769570 [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.16-beta1-RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt?r=169

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-13 Thread Javen O'Neal
> One thing that I found is that Ant-target "assemble" fails now because we > call the target "maven-pom", but the directory "maven" and the pom.xml > files are not included in the source-package.. "ant clean assemble" works for me on a full svn checkout. Are you referring to assemble failing when

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-13 Thread Dominik Stadler
+1 verified the contents of the various packages and did a full build from the sources via target "jenkins". One thing that I found is that Ant-target "assemble" fails now because we call the target "maven-pom", but the directory "maven" and the pom.xml files are not included in the source-packag

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

2016-11-13 Thread Andreas Beeker
+1 I've copy&paste-checked the signatures, checked the archives for clutter and ran a very small XSLF test project. In the release note the "... password ..." line should be replaced by: - Add support for mixed-length cipher/hashes in password protected files typically used by Office for Mac (.