https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59734
--- Comment #2 from David North ---
The rather old patch I'm working from hides that logic in the key, so I'll
probably go with that approach.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
Bug ID: 59738
Summary: Excel Files generated using XSSFWorkbook can't be
opened using Ms-Excel or OpenOffice
Product: POI
Version: 3.14-FINAL
Hardware: PC
I can't find the flash drive I put my private key on. Someone else will
need to be release manager for 3.15 beta 2 unless a miracle happens.
On Jun 20, 2016 04:01, "Dominik Stadler" wrote:
> Ok,
>
> No problem, the regression testing is running fairly stable now and most
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59717
Nick Burch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
--- Comment #1 from Tim Allison ---
I'll run the full corpus regression tests shortly to see if there are other
values we need to add. Or, should we undo this check?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
I'm fine with using ZipFile directly internally in SWSSFWorkbook. A quick
look did not reveal any glaring security problem with doing this. We mostly
prevent denial-of-service types of attacks here so if a malicious user can
overwrite the temporary file he can do lots of other bad things anyway...
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
Bug ID: 59739
Summary: Need to expand options in
FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
Nick Burch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
--- Comment #3 from Tim Allison ---
Y, the problem goes away if I save as.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
--- Comment #4 from Nick Burch ---
I guess we need to work out what format type these are (maybe by seeing what
they contain, or what Word treats them as?), then add a few more "unofficial"
entries to the check list
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
--- Comment #2 from Adrodoc55 ---
(In reply to Dominik Stadler from comment #1)
> Does it work if you specify a sheet-name in the call to createSheet()?
No it does not.
I have tried many different variants, and
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
--- Comment #5 from Javen O'Neal ---
Reverting any deprecated code deletion I did as part of bug 59170 is also an
acceptable fix here. I was pretty heavy handed with HWPF.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
--- Comment #3 from Javen O'Neal ---
Are you using the same version of poi, poi-ooxml, and poi-ooxml-schemas?
Does wb.write throw an exception?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
--- Comment #6 from Dominik Stadler ---
In my regression-run, the following invalid versions are found:
EXCEPTIONTEXT315BETA2
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Invalid file format version number: 113
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
--- Comment #4 from Adrodoc55 ---
(In reply to Javen O'Neal from comment #3)
> Are you using the same version of poi, poi-ooxml, and poi-ooxml-schemas?
>
> Does wb.write throw an exception?
I am using v3.14 of
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
--- Comment #7 from Nick Burch ---
Those look like clusters around the valid values (plus an outlier at 113)
I'd be tempted to say we accept any value +- 4 without much/any logging (and +-
113). Could someone check, for
17 matches
Mail list logo