[Bug 54353] different colors of chart

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54353 --- Comment #4 from Greg Woolsey --- If the file specifies to use Excel's default color palette, that depends on the document or system theme colors. "Automatic" setting doesn't store the color info in the XLSX document.

[Bug 61267] Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 --- Comment #2 from Javen O'Neal --- Nevermind. Looks like this claims to be a Word 2.0 file. http://www.filesignatures.net/index.php?page=search=DBA52D00=SIG > DB A5 2D 00 Word 2.0 file, ASCII -- You are receiving this

[Bug 54353] different colors of chart

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54353 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |enhancement -- You

[Bug 58294] Pivot Table corrupted when saving an xlsx workbook

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58294 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal

[Bug 54353] different colors of chart

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54353 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 57332] FormulaEvaluator with external references

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57332 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ---

[Bug 61267] Extract text from Microsoft Word 2.0 (pre-OLE2) document

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Meta data of attached word |Extract text from

[Bug 61267] Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ---

[Bug 60685] Unable to parse .pub files -java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 88

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Component|POI Overall |HPBF --- Comment #3

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-OpenJDK #199

See Changes: [kiwiwings] font rendering - handle a few system dependent textbox sizes [fanningpj] [Bug-61268] avoid NegativeArraySizeException parsing doc file [fanningpj] fix spelling [kiwiwings] use excel

[Bug 60685] Unable to parse .pub files -java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 88

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685 --- Comment #2 from Javen O'Neal --- The last real change to supporting HPBF hyperlinks was nearly 9 years ago, and even then the commit message indicated partial hyperlink support. So it's quite likely that we haven't fully

[Bug 60685] Unable to parse .pub files -java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 88

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685 --- Comment #1 from Javen O'Neal --- Knowing nothing about the Compound File Binary Format (is this the same as or a predecessor to OLE2 containers?) [1.2] CHNKINK record offset = 0x8200 QC Bit offset = 0x8340 - 0x8200 =

[Bug 61268] NegativeArraySizeException on doc file picture

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: TestFonts failing on my laptop

I'm temporarily commented out the assertion that was failing. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1801395 -- View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/TestFonts-failing-on-my-laptop-tp5728134p5728135.html Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at

Re: TestFonts failing on my laptop

Although the .ttf-Font is provided, the rendering can be quite different. [1] That's the reason, why I'm trying to also execute the Job on the Windows machines too - currently I'm playing around with Jenkins pipeline syntax. What happens if you change something in GraphicsEnvironment.prefer*() ?

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 --- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning --- POI 3.16 / Tika 1.15 S3-142235/S3-142235 Comments on S3-142030 VF proposal TR 33969-071_rm.doc Caused by: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException at

TestFonts failing on my laptop

Hi, The new test, TestFonts, is failing on my laptop. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1801329 I have a Mac and the font size seems to be 399 instead of the 312 expected in the test. java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<399.0> but was:<312.0> at

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 --- Comment #5 from gaurav.c...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 35107 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35107=edit 2014 doc file File size is 6 MB. It can be downloaded from below link:

[Bug 61268] NegativeArraySizeException on doc file picture

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Parse Failed

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 --- Comment #2 from gaurav.c...@gmail.com --- Thanks for response! This is a new file 2015 file not an old file. I am just testing it to see if it can be used in comparison to Other options. Have a good day ahead! -- You are receiving

Re: Java 6 support

> My 2 cents is that we could continue to support a 3.x branch and backport security fixes and fixes that would be generally useful to a wide community. I could get behind back porting security fixes since they're fairly infrequent and small. Fully maintaining a branch would get tricky as the

Re: Java 6 support

> Andi just tried to use more generics in some places and this showed a > problem either in Java 9 or Java 6 and thus he reverted this change again. AFAIK this also happened when I've refactored the SL Common interfaces, but I've forgotten about it :S This is a bug in Java 6 ... there are a few

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1

[Bug 61268] New: Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 Bug ID: 61268 Summary: Parse Failed Product: POI Version: 3.16-dev Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: POI Overall

Re: Java 6 support

Hi, POI is already fully working on Java 9 (at least according to our unit-tests at https://builds.apache.org/view/P/view/POI/job/POI-DSL-1.9/, and I once ran the full regression suite with some pre-release of Java 9 to check for additional problems.), there are some module-adjustment that are

[Bug 61182] Invalid signature created for streamed xlsx file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61182 Andreas Beeker changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Invalid signature created |Invalid

Re: Java 6 support

I favour more regular non-beta releases generally and like the idea of a 4.0 release. I'm pretty neutral on the JRE version support. My employers mandate JRE 1.8 usage and I think, for security reasons, this is the right approach. My 2 cents is that we could continue to support a 3.x branch and

Jenkins build is back to normal : POI-DSL-1.6 #398

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 61266] Extract text from Microsoft Write document

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 --- Comment #7 from Nick Burch --- I've added a more helpful exception for these files in r1801376, based on the mime magic from Apache Tika for them -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

Jenkins build is back to normal : POI-DSL-Maven #259

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Java 6 support

Then let's kick XMLBeans to POI 5.0 and drop Java 6 ASAP if it's preventing Java 9 support. Java 9 is just around the corner (July 27). We should aim to support Java 9 the day it's released so we're not a reason for other software projects to delay Java 9 adoption. Have we addressed the open

Re: Java 6 support

+1 for switching now or after POI 3.17 ... if we will do a 3.17 final soonish. I'm actually bringing this up, as I was facing again problems with generics bugs in Java 6 and independently had a devops discussion with fluxo yesterday, questioning me/us why we are still on Java 6 level. > If

Re: svn commit: r1801373 - in /poi/trunk/src: java/org/apache/poi/sl/usermodel/ ooxml/testcases/org/apache/poi/sl/

Is this a bug in the JVM implementation or are self-referential generics not allowed per the Java 6 language spec? Are our jenkins slaves using the latest version of Java 6? Looks like Java 6 and 9 support are mutually exclusive here. Time to drop Java 6 support. On Jul 9, 2017 5:27 PM,

Re: Java 6 support

The Android dev team have been making progress on Java 8 support, including 3rd party libraries, though currently still is a subset of the full Java 8 language specification. There will be more problems with Android API level <=23 (Marshmallow and older).

Re: Java 6 support

Hi, +1 for Java 7 in POI 4 after 3.17 is out. And I for not investing too much in backwards compatibility, people on Java 6 likely still run POI 3.9 anyway. I'm -1 on Java 8, as 7 is still needed for Android AFAIK and we get a number of requests in that area lately. Dominik On Jul 9, 2017

Re: Java 6 support

> (writing an iterator in Java is particularly painful). We could also leapfrog Java 7 and go straight to Java 8 with support for streams and lambdas. And yes, it's a can of worms to try to compile Java 7/8 source to Java 6 bytecode. It shouldn't be, as that's one of the glorious things about

Re: Java 6 support

+1 I'm in favor of dropping Java 6 support. If users still need to run new versions of POI on old JVMs, they should be able to cross-compile, though it may require some extra tools on their end to modify the bytecode to be compatible with and old JVM. If we can figure out a way to maintain

[Bug 61266] Extract text from Microsoft Write document

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Extract text from old Word |Extract text from

[Bug 61266] Extract text from old Word file from 1991

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|File not parsing|Extract text from

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |enhancement ---

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-OpenJDK #198

See Changes: [kiwiwings] SL Common: narrow generics definition because of tighter java9 checks -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 --- Comment #4 from Javen O'Neal --- If this is a 1991 Word file, then perhaps HWPFOldDocument (for Word 6 and Word 95) should be used instead of HWPFDocument (BIFF8). It's possible that this file format predates Word 6.

Re: Java 6 support

It has been a while that we've discussed this topic ... or at least I couldn't find another more recent/decent thread ... [1] How about switching to Java 7 now? If we'd do, will we change to version 4 then? Andi [1] http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Java-6-support-td5721373.html --

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-Maven #258

See Changes: [kiwiwings] SL Common: narrow generics definition because of tighter java9 checks -- [...truncated 3.49 KB...] drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Oct 25 2016 lib

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major -- You are receiving

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal

Jenkins build is back to normal : POI-DSL-1.9 #42

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ---

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-1.6 #397

See Changes: [kiwiwings] SL Common: narrow generics definition because of tighter java9 checks -- [...truncated 8.39 KB...] 1800K .. .. .. ..

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All CC|

[Bug 61267] Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gaurav.c...@gmail.com -- You

[Bug 61267] Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All Severity|normal

[Bug 61267] New: Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 Bug ID: 61267 Summary: Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank Product: POI Version: 3.16-dev Hardware: PC

[Bug 61266] New: File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Bug ID: 61266 Summary: File not parsing Product: POI Version: 3.16-dev Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: POI

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-1.9 #41

See Changes: [kiwiwings] test environment via ant - not via the shell - hope that makes sense ... [kiwiwings] add .ttf to ignored test integration resources [kiwiwings] #61169 - Text with Japanese characters

[Bug 61265] AIOOBE when reading doc file (Section table parsing)

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61265 --- Comment #7 from gaurav.c...@gmail.com --- HOw to resave the file from doc to docx while retaining the original file meta data (especially content creation date)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.