[GitHub] [poi] centic9 commented on a change in pull request #224: Use Log4j 2 for logging

centic9 commented on a change in pull request #224: URL: https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/224#discussion_r568637101 ## File path: log4j2-console.xml ## @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ + Review comment: Is there a way to move the two xml-configuration files away from the

[GitHub] [poi] MariusVolkhart commented on a change in pull request #224: Use Log4j 2 for logging

MariusVolkhart commented on a change in pull request #224: URL: https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/224#discussion_r569002478 ## File path: log4j2-console.xml ## @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ + Review comment: > Is there a way to move the two xml-configuration files away from the

Build failed in Jenkins: POI » POI-DSL-1.8 #156

See Changes: [PJ Fanning] remove accidental commit [PJ Fanning] [bug-65120] PartAlreadyExistsException when creating cell comments (after some comments removed). Thanks to Raúl Wegmann

Build failed in Jenkins: POI » POI-DSL-OpenJDK #118

See Changes: [PJ Fanning] remove accidental commit [PJ Fanning] [bug-65120] PartAlreadyExistsException when creating cell comments (after some comments removed). Thanks to Raúl Wegmann

Build failed in Jenkins: POI » POI-DSL-Github-PullRequests #6

See Changes: [Marius Volkhart] Use Log4j 2 for logging [Marius Volkhart] fixup! Use Log4j 2 for logging [Marius Volkhart] fixup! Use Log4j 2 for logging [Marius Volkhart] fixup! Use Log4j 2

Build failed in Jenkins: POI » POI-DSL-Github-PullRequests #5

See Changes: [Marius Volkhart] Use Log4j 2 for logging [Marius Volkhart] fixup! Use Log4j 2 for logging [Marius Volkhart] fixup! Use Log4j 2 for logging [Marius Volkhart] fixup! Use Log4j 2

[GitHub] [poi] MariusVolkhart commented on a change in pull request #224: Use Log4j 2 for logging

MariusVolkhart commented on a change in pull request #224: URL: https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/224#discussion_r569002478 ## File path: log4j2-console.xml ## @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ + Review comment: > Is there a way to move the two xml-configuration files away from the

[Bug 65103] Java application cannot launch using JPMS and POI-OOXML 5.0.0

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Beeker --- Created attachment 37725 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37725=edit Fixed project Fixed project attached > mvn clean package > java --module-path target/modules --module

[Bug 65103] Java application cannot launch using JPMS and POI-OOXML 5.0.0

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Beeker --- Regarding "Provider class org.apache.batik.bridge.RhinoInterpreterFactory not in module": see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1260 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 65120] [PATCH] PartAlreadyExistsException when creating cell comments

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 65120] [PATCH] PartAlreadyExistsException when creating cell comments

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120 --- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning --- thanks - applied using r1886143 (the gradle change has since been reverted) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: poi-ooxml-lite 5.0.0

poi-ooxml-lite is a subset of poi-ooxml-full - there is a sources jar for  poi-ooxml-full https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/poi/poi-ooxml-full/5.0.0/ On Tuesday 2 February 2021, 20:55:40 GMT, Nick Burch wrote: On Tue, 2 Feb 2021, Feiger, Dieter wrote: > I am locking for the

Re: poi-ooxml-lite 5.0.0

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021, Feiger, Dieter wrote: I am locking for the source code of the poi-ooxml-lite of the Version 5.0.0. I am planning to use this library in one of my projects, but before I can do this the legal department has to check the terms and conditions of usage. This includes also the

poi-ooxml-lite 5.0.0

Hi all, I am locking for the source code of the poi-ooxml-lite of the Version 5.0.0. I am planning to use this library in one of my projects, but before I can do this the legal department has to check the terms and conditions of usage. This includes also the source code. Normally I would find

[Bug 63421] An XDDFScatterChartData chart with a single series and default formatting has non-uniform formatting

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63421 Alain Fagot Bearez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

[Bug 65120] [PATCH] PartAlreadyExistsException when creating cell comments

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120 Raúl Wegmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@wegmann.es OS|

[Bug 65120] [PATCH] PartAlreadyExistsException when creating cell comments

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120 --- Comment #1 from Raúl Wegmann --- Created attachment 37724 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37724=edit patch including test -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65120] New: [PATCH] PartAlreadyExistsException when creating cell comments

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120 Bug ID: 65120 Summary: [PATCH] PartAlreadyExistsException when creating cell comments Product: POI Version: 4.1.2-FINAL Hardware: PC Status: NEW

[Bug 63421] An XDDFScatterChartData chart with a single series and default formatting has non-uniform formatting

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63421 --- Comment #4 from David --- data.setVaryColors(false) also works fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [poi] centic9 commented on a change in pull request #224: Use Log4j 2 for logging

centic9 commented on a change in pull request #224: URL: https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/224#discussion_r568637101 ## File path: log4j2-console.xml ## @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ + Review comment: Is there a way to move the two xml-configuration files away from the

Re: POI 5.0.1?

Hi, About bugs related to charts, I managed to fix three of them. I don't have much hope to fix any other in the next few days. +1 for 5.0.1 as soon as reasonably possible Best regards, Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ ⁣Obter o BlueMail para Android ​ Em 1 de fev de 2021 14:44, em 14:44, Dominik Stadler