[Bug 66085] New: org.openxmlformats.schemas.wordprocessingml.x2006.main.STHint missing ENUM value
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66085 Bug ID: 66085 Summary: org.openxmlformats.schemas.wordprocessingml.x2006.main .STHint missing ENUM value Product: POI Version: unspecified Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XWPF Assignee: dev@poi.apache.org Reporter: chrisl...@hotmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 38302 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38302=edit Failing Word Doc Hi, I'm not sure this is strictly the correct place to log this, but I don't know where else to go. We are currently attempting an upgrade of POI from v4.1.2 to v5.2.2. In this we note in your release notes that this includes an update in conformance to the ECMA-376 fifth edition spec. With the updated libraries, running the attached Word Document we received an unexpected error: string value 'cs' is not a valid enumeration value for ST_Hint in namespace http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main. org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.values.XmlValueOutOfRangeException: string value 'cs' is not a valid enumeration value for ST_Hint in namespace http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main Having investigated this, I see that it's not really a problem with POI per se. According to the PDF of the spec: Ecma Office Open XML Part 1 - Fundamentals And Markup Language Reference.pdf - 17.18.41 ST_Hint (Font Type Hint) p.1396 (page 1406) cs (Complex Script Font) is mentioned as a possible value - A.1 WordprocessingML p.3841 (page 3851) Line 1715 of the XSD shows 'cs' as a possible value. However, in the actual XSD used to generate the XMLBeans classes: ECMA-376-Fifth-Edition-Part-4-Transitional-Migration-Features.zip - OfficeOpenXML-XMLSchema-Transitional.zip - wml.xsd Line 1789 of the XSD there is no STHint.CS ENUM and thus no ENUM in the code generated by XMLBeans. So I can see that the POI classes are simply conforming to the XSD via XMLBeans generation. For now we can work around this fact, but is this something you guys are able to modify/fix as part of your processes? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
Re: xmlbeans 5.1.0 release
+1 Dominik. On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:22 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > There are a fair number of unreleased changes in XMLBeans. Is it time for > a v5.1.0 release? > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-604?jql=project%20%3D%20XMLBEANS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Version%205.1.0%22 > > I can put together an RC if there are no objections. > > Regards, > PJ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org > >
xmlbeans 5.1.0 release
Hi everyone, There are a fair number of unreleased changes in XMLBeans. Is it time for a v5.1.0 release? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-604?jql=project%20%3D%20XMLBEANS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Version%205.1.0%22 I can put together an RC if there are no objections. Regards, PJ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 66083] support CEILING.MATH and FLOOR.MATH functions
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66083 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 66083] support CEILING.MATH and FLOOR.MATH functions
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66083 --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- I have added changes today for this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 66083] New: support CEILING.MATH and FLOOR.MATH functions
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66083 Bug ID: 66083 Summary: support CEILING.MATH and FLOOR.MATH functions Product: POI Version: 5.2.2-FINAL Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: SS Common Assignee: dev@poi.apache.org Reporter: fannin...@yahoo.com Target Milestone: --- https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/floor-math-function-c302b599-fbdb-4177-ba19-2c2b1249a2f5 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/ceiling-math-function-80f95d2f-b499-4eee-9f16-f795a8e306c8 Also - add missing test cases for legacy floor and math functions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[GitHub] [poi] asfgit closed pull request #331: chore: Included githubactions in the dependabot config
asfgit closed pull request #331: chore: Included githubactions in the dependabot config URL: https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/331 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 66022] FormulaParseException: Parse error near char 0
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66022 --- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning --- added patch with r1901162 - will see what happens with CI build before proceeding with any further changes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 66022] FormulaParseException: Parse error near char 0
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66022 renfi...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #4 from renfi...@yahoo.com --- I also came across this bug. The problematic method seems to be FormulaParser:parseSheetName. In the patch I added unit tests which trigger this bug and also added a first try for a fix. Tested the fix for the file provided by max (by opening it in unit test and shifting a row). Worked for me with fix. Additional issue: In 'TestXSSFFormulaParser:testQuotedSheetNamesReference' I also added a uncommented test-case, which does not work with or without the fix. Problem there is also related to FormulaParser:parseSheetName. Additional "'" get added around sheet-name. Since I am new to POI-library, I can not tell if this is actually is a problem or not. Hope someone with more experience in this area, can resolve these issue(s). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 66022] FormulaParseException: Parse error near char 0
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66022 --- Comment #3 from renfi...@yahoo.com --- Created attachment 38300 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38300=edit unit tests and first try for fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (XMLBEANS-567) Problems with XMLBeans Extension Interfaces Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17540834#comment-17540834
]
Peter Keller commented on XMLBEANS-567:
---
[~pj.fanning] My simple test case works fine for me with the new JAR. It
doesn't work with my existing project that I would like to migrate from 3.1.0
because of memory usage problems in JavaParser, but that is a completely
separate issue of course.
> Problems with XMLBeans Extension Interfaces Feature
> ---
>
> Key: XMLBEANS-567
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-567
> Project: XMLBeans
> Issue Type: Task
>Affects Versions: Version 5.0.0
>Reporter: Dmitry Lastochkin
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Version 5.1.0
>
> Attachments: xmlbeans-ie-tryout.tar, xmlbeans-ie-tryout2.tar
>
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Hello! In our project we are using [XMLBeans Extension Interfaces
> Feature|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/XMLBEANS/ExtensionInterfacesFeature].
> When we compile the TypeSystem (using {{SchemaTypeSystemCompiler.compile}}),
> we add the jar with our extension classes to classpath parameter. In XMLBeans
> 2.4 it works perfectly. But when we updated to XMLBeans 5.0.0, we encountered
> the following error during an extensions validation:
> {code}
> Interface 'SomeInterface' not found."
> {code}
> As far as I understand, this is because
> {{org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.config.Parser}} does not search classes in
> classpath (only in files).
> When we added the sources of the extension interface to the parameters,
> TypeSystem compiled successfuly. But then we ran into another problem. When
> XMLBeans generates java files from XSD, it uses simple class names (instead
> of fully qualified names as it was in XMLBeans 2.4.0) for the classes that
> are used in methods of the extension interface (like parameters types or
> return types). And therefore the geneted files cannot be compiled if the
> extension classes are in a different package.
> Are those changes (ingorning classpath when searching for extenstions and
> using simple names for extenstion classes in code generation instead of fully
> qualified names) were made intentionally? Such limitations are hard to work
> around, making an upgrade from older XMLBeans version very complicated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
