[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 Dominik Stadlerchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Dominik Stadler --- I don't think we currently plan to invest more time on this, so I am closing this as FIXED as all the sample-documents from our commoncrawl-corpus are now handled correctly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 --- Comment #9 from Nick Burch--- In r1750866, I've changed it so that likely "nearby" values are subject to the same check as the "official" values, and if passed no logging occurs. Hopefully this helps and doesn't trigger any new warnings! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 --- Comment #8 from Dominik Stadler--- I have applied a quick fix in r1750864 so that such documents do not fail until we have decided on a complete solution here. The code now logs out the unknown version number instead of throwing an exception. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 Dominik Stadlerchanged: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |3.15-dev -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 --- Comment #7 from Nick Burch--- Those look like clusters around the valid values (plus an outlier at 113) I'd be tempted to say we accept any value +- 4 without much/any logging (and +- 113). Could someone check, for a few triggering files, how their cbRgFcLcb values match with what the spec says to expect for the nearest-valid nFib values? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 --- Comment #6 from Dominik Stadler--- In my regression-run, the following invalid versions are found: EXCEPTIONTEXT315BETA2 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Invalid file format version number: 113 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Invalid file format version number: 191 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Invalid file format version number: 192 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Invalid file format version number: 194 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Invalid file format version number: 195 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Invalid file format version number: 216 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Invalid file format version number: 265 java.lang.IllegalStateException: Invalid file format version number: 267 We can add those as "undocumented", but I'd probably go with a POILogger.warning() instead of the throw to not fail on other version-numbers that are not included in our test-files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 --- Comment #5 from Javen O'Neal--- Reverting any deprecated code deletion I did as part of bug 59170 is also an acceptable fix here. I was pretty heavy handed with HWPF. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 --- Comment #4 from Nick Burch--- I guess we need to work out what format type these are (maybe by seeing what they contain, or what Word treats them as?), then add a few more "unofficial" entries to the check list -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 --- Comment #3 from Tim Allison--- Y, the problem goes away if I save as. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 Nick Burchchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #2 from Nick Burch --- Based on the file format specs - https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd949344(v=office.12).aspx and https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd950103(v=office.12).aspx - it looks like we have all the "official" cases covered Do these files start passing again if you do a save-as from word? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 59739] Need to expand options in FileInformationBlock.assertCbRgFcLcb
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 --- Comment #1 from Tim Allison--- I'll run the full corpus regression tests shortly to see if there are other values we need to add. Or, should we undo this check? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org