The vote has passed with 4x +1 from POI PMCs.
I'll now release the artifacts and announce it on Monday.
Andi.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
Hi,
Reports from my regression tests are available, no failures compared to
4.0.0 are shown any more now that I managed to run with much more main
memory. Also the number of OOMs is down to 39 overall now.
See
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index400RC1to401RC2.html
and
+1
Reports are available here:
http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_4_0_1-rc2.tgz
Thank you, Andi!
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:01 PM Andreas Beeker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 4.0.1 (RC2).
>
> The most notable changes in this release are:
>
> -
+1
Thanks for all the hard work getting this over the line.
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi,
I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 4.0.1 (RC2).
The most notable changes in this release are:
- dependency updates to XMLBeans 3.0.2 / Bouncycastle 1.60
- XSSF: import chart on drawing
- XDDF: Define XDDF user model for text body, its paragraphs and text runs
- OPC:
Hi,
thanks for fixing FileMagic, I just noticed the same bug and planned to fix
it as well.
I just committed one small change so we do not include jars from the new
directory ooxml-testlib in the source-distribution similar to all the other
lib-directories.
Dominik.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at
Not sure if this is necessary, but I formally cancel now RC1 and remove its
sources ... giving way for RC2.
As #60316 is fixed now - I'll check a few of the common crawl results for low
hanging fruits and fix them.
After that I'll roll a RC2 soon - if you have anything to put into 4.0.1
Hi,
I could speed it up somewhat, results are available, all seems well on this
regression front, see
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index400RC1to401RC1.html
for comparison to 4.0.0 and
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reportsAll/index400RC1to401RC1.html
Hi,
somehow the run is taking a long time this time around, estimate finish is
Nov. 26 in the afternoon at the moment.
Until now my runs was quite limited in amount of memory I could use, but I
can now run it with more memory now as I can run on newer hardware, so
hopefully the number of OOMs
Maybe its obvious, but before I roll another RC I'm waiting for Dominiks common
crawl results - as we have the opportunity to add another stability fix.
Btw. what makes me "sad", ... is to see those OOMs.
Can't we simply exclude them ... in the statistics? ;)
But to be serious again - is there
Bugs
59773,59834,62690,62692,62699,62733,62735,62740,62768,62796,62800,62805,62807
and 62811 were fixed after 4.0 release, but not reflected in the 4.0.1
change log.
See
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED=resolution=2018-09-07=Now=bug_id=POI_format=advanced=FIXED
With
The real fix is https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62692 -
XMLBeans-519 fixes a similar issue in XMLBeans (the SAXHelper code in
XMLBeans is basically a copy/paste of POI equivalent).
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62943 fix was to bring back a
try catch block around the code that had been removed in 4.0.0.
The 4.0.0 issue seems to affect users that have very old parsers - typically
part of Application Servers that have their own non-standard parsers.
I'm happy
Hi,
If possible we should also review
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62943 and ensure 4.0.1 does
it correctly as it sounds as if we may have broken compatibility with JDK 8
somehow.
Dominik.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:34 PM Tim Allison wrote:
> Sorry, now that I've figured out
Sorry, now that I've figured out what the problem was, I'm -1. Y,
let's respin.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 4:34 PM Andreas Beeker wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> On 21.11.18 19:26, Tim Allison wrote:
> > This looks like a regression.
>
>
> Please make your mind up, if this is a "-1".
>
> Creating a new RC
Hi Tim,
On 21.11.18 19:26, Tim Allison wrote:
This looks like a regression.
Please make your mind up, if this is a "-1".
Creating a new RC is not a big deal, I only think about the hours of computing
power needed to process the common crawl.
Andi
Ok, thanks for the explanation, I am +1 from this point of view then.
Dominik.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 18:00 Andreas Beeker wrote:
> On 21.11.18 07:09, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> > However the maven-subdir is missing the directory "ooxml-schemas" now. I
> > think this should still be included,
Tim - would you be able to provide some sample files and we can add some
regression tests?
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
In the debugger:
XWPFHeaderFooterPolicy hfPolicy = document.getHeaderFooterPolicy();
the hfPolicy in 4.0.1 has nothing in it; whereas in 4.0.0, there's a
firstPageHeader (header3.xml), an evenPageHeader (header1.xml), a
defaultHeader (header2.xml) and a defaultFooter(footer1).
This looks like a
>These were in the header...I have to step away from the keyboard for
now...any ideas?
I confirmed this by flipping btwn 4.0.0 and 4.0.1 in our dependencies
and using our Tika's SNAPSHOT for both. This is not caused by a
different version of Tika.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:53 PM Tim Allison
Y, my suspicion holds up. If you look at TOP_10_UNIQUE_TOKEN_DIFFS_A
in content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx, there aren't any unique words
we were extracting with 4.0.0 that we're not extracting with 4.0.1 in
the vast majority of ppt files. Note, too, that while the number of
tokens differs, the
Reports are available here:
http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_4_0_1-rc1.tgz
We have a bunch less content in ppt, but I _think_ this is because at
the Tika level we used to duplicate notes content, and we've fixed
that bug. So, I think this is an improvement, but I need to check.
On Wed,
I'm +1 -- the fix can wait till 4.0.2 and there is the workaround to use full
schema jar.
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For
On 21.11.18 10:47, pj.fanning wrote:
I found a few missing classes in poi-ooxml-schemas.jar.
Is this now a "-1", i.e. a must-have otherwise we get a lot of stackoverflow
messages complaining about it
... or a "0-", i.e. nice-to-have, but until 4.0.2 is out, the users can use the
full-schema
On 21.11.18 07:09, Dominik Stadler wrote:
However the maven-subdir is missing the directory "ooxml-schemas" now. I
think this should still be included, or? In 4.0.0 it contains
ooxml-schemas-1.4.jar/ooxml-schemas-1.4-sources.jar and checksums.
I've provided the ooxml-schemas 1.4 as part of the
I found a few missing classes in poi-ooxml-schemas.jar.
We have some gaps in the XDDF testing and this leads to us not adding all
the necessary OOXML classes for XDDF to the poi-ooxml-schemas.jar.
https://github.com/apache/poi/commit/df83dab1a49900d85d9a20c0ee6d5a7a31f0eb9c
--
Sent from:
Hi,
I started to compare things, -bin-..zip looks good, contents of
poi-ooxml-schemas looks sane.
However the maven-subdir is missing the directory "ooxml-schemas" now. I
think this should still be included, or? In 4.0.0 it contains
ooxml-schemas-1.4.jar/ooxml-schemas-1.4-sources.jar and
>which extra ".jar"???
The first one, clearly. :D Thank you!
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:01 PM Andreas Beeker wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> which extra ".jar"??? :)
>
> ... just kidding, I've fixed it and thank you!
>
> I was already wondering, that the release process was too smooth.
> Only my local
Hi Tim,
which extra ".jar"??? :)
... just kidding, I've fixed it and thank you!
I was already wondering, that the release process was too smooth.
Only my local version of the commons-openpgp needed to be used. [1]
Andi
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-508
On 20.11.18
Andi,
Thank you! I've built this locally and integrated it into Tika, and
I've kicked off the regression tests. The one small glitch I noticed
so far is that poi-ooxml-schemas jar has an extra ".jar" in it:
build/dist/maven/poi-ooxml-schemas/poi-ooxml-schemas-4.0.1.jar.jar
I'll let you all
HI *,
I thought #62872 would be a blocker, but I guess the problem is simply the file
size and it's not working with 3.17 either (for me).
Therefore if nobody minds, I would prepare a release candidate next weekend.
Andi.
PS: I'm currently unable to fix an AffineTransformation problem with
t;
> Von: "pj.fanning"
> Gesendet: Tue Oct 30 04:59:08 GMT-03:00 2018
> An: dev@poi.apache.org
> Betreff: POI 4.0.1 release
>
> Is it time for us to look at doing a POI 4.0.1 release?
>
> Are there any issues we would like to see completed before we proceed?
improvement of the API for charts.
Gesendet mit BlueMail
Von: "pj.fanning"
Gesendet: Tue Oct 30 04:59:08 GMT-03:00 2018
An: dev@poi.apache.org
Betreff: POI 4.0.1 release
Is it time for us to look at doing a POI 4.0.1 release?
Are there any issues we would like to see completed before
e anyway, just waiting
> to see if the contributor is planning any follow-up patches. Please give me
> time till the end of this week.
>
> Yegor
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:59 AM pj.fanning wrote:
>
> > Is it time for us to look at doing a POI 4.0.1 release?
> >
+1
Bug 62836 is pending. I'm going to check in the code anyway, just waiting
to see if the contributor is planning any follow-up patches. Please give me
time till the end of this week.
Yegor
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:59 AM pj.fanning wrote:
> Is it time for us to look at doing a POI 4.
+1 for rolling it out soon
I think the grace period is over and we can go on rolling the fixes out.
Also my (H)EMF implementation is giving promising results and although EMF+
is not yet implemented, I think the slideshow users, would benefit from it
... but I don't want to spoil the bugfix
Is it time for us to look at doing a POI 4.0.1 release?
Are there any issues we would like to see completed before we proceed?
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
-
To unsubscribe, e
37 matches
Mail list logo
