Casting a belated +1 :-)
Thanks Artur!
On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 11:11 AM Artur Rakhmatulin
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!
>
> I guess we can consider this VOTE as done, where we reached the
> consensus to use "apache-polaris" as the future Python package name for
> Apache Polaris in PYPI repository.
>
Hello everyone!
I guess we can consider this VOTE as done, where we reached the
consensus to use "apache-polaris" as the future Python package name for
Apache Polaris in PYPI repository.
I have prepared the necessary changes, please review.
- https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2812
On
Hello everyone.
I am opening a VOTE to use "apache-polaris" as the name for the official
Python package of Apache Polaris.
-Why this is necessary was discussed here [1]
-"apache-polaris" fully complies with the Apache Distribution Guide [2]
-Initial Issue - Package Python CLI tool in the binary
+1(binding)
Yufei
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 8:43 AM Prashant Singh
wrote:
> +1 (nb)
>
> Best,
> Prashant Singh
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 8:03 AM Honah J. wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jonas
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 9:49 AM Russell Spitzer <
> russell.spit...@g
+1 (binding)
Since this vote is for a name that ends up in code, I propose to use the
consensus approval [1] process (at least 3 binding votes, no vetoes) and a
72 hour minimum voting time window.
[1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting
Cheers,
Dmitri.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 6:18 AM Artur
+1 (nb)
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 8:03 AM Honah J. wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best regards,
> Jonas
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 9:49 AM Russell Spitzer >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 7:59 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (bind
+1 (non-binding)
Best regards,
Jonas
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 9:49 AM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 7:59 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Since this vote is for a name that ends up in code, I propose to use the
> > consensus approval
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 7:59 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Since this vote is for a name that ends up in code, I propose to use the
> consensus approval [1] process (at least 3 binding votes, no vetoes) and a
> 72 hour minimum voting time window.
>
> [1] https://w
