Re: Pull requests against polaris-tools

2025-04-17 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hey We have already renovate config. No need to have single/common Gradle file. We can define paths in the configuration: https://github.com/apache/polaris-tools/blob/main/.github/renovate.json5 I created https://github.com/apache/polaris-tools/pull/7 about CODEOWNERS. Regards JB On Thu, Apr 1

Re: Pull requests against polaris-tools

2025-04-17 Thread Pierre Laporte
Yes it could be useful too. Would it require all projects inside polaris-tools to be managed with a common Gradle build file? -- Pierre On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 7:29 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > By the way, do you also want other resources (like renovate config) ? > > I guess not, but wan

Re: Pull requests against polaris-tools

2025-04-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
By the way, do you also want other resources (like renovate config) ? I guess not, but wanted to double check. Regards JB On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 6:31 PM Pierre Laporte wrote: > > Hi folks > > I am going to open a few PR against the polaris-tools repository to improve > benchmarks, especially r

Re: Pull requests against polaris-tools

2025-04-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, The LDAP group is the same. What's missing on polaris-tools is the .github/CODEOWNERS (used to auto assign reviewers). I will add it. Regards JB On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 6:31 PM Pierre Laporte wrote: > > Hi folks > > I am going to open a few PR against the polaris-tools repository to improv

Pull requests against polaris-tools

2025-04-16 Thread Pierre Laporte
Hi folks I am going to open a few PR against the polaris-tools repository to improve benchmarks, especially regarding update-related workloads. I opened a new PR but noticed that, unlike with the PR against `apache/polaris`, nobody is automatically added as reviewer when a pull request is created