Mars Hall created PIO-102:
-----------------------------

             Summary: ESEngineInstances `getAll` results out of order 
(Elasticsearch 5.x)
                 Key: PIO-102
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-102
             Project: PredictionIO
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Core
    Affects Versions: 0.11.0-incubating
            Reporter: Mars Hall
            Assignee: Mars Hall


Using the new Elasticsearch 5.x REST storage client as the meta storage source 
(`PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_METADATA_SOURCE=ELASTICSEARCH` setup in 
conf/pio-env.sh), I found that once an engine has been trained a certain number 
of times, that the most recent engine instance is no longer retrieved. So, I 
tracked down where those Elasticsearch queries originate.

In the original Elasticsearch 1.x storage client, [the "scroll" pagination 
responses are collected by 
*appending*|https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/blob/release/0.11.0/storage/elasticsearch1/src/main/scala/org/apache/predictionio/data/storage/elasticsearch/ESUtils.scala#L44]
 them to one another.

In the new Elasticsearch 5.x client, [the "scroll" responses are collected by 
*prepending*|https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/blob/release/0.11.0/storage/elasticsearch/src/main/scala/org/apache/predictionio/data/storage/elasticsearch/ESUtils.scala#L152]
 them to one another.

This out-of-order concatenation breaks [ESEngineInstances 
`getLatestCompleted`|https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/blob/release/0.11.0/storage/elasticsearch/src/main/scala/org/apache/predictionio/data/storage/elasticsearch/ESEngineInstances.scala#L192]
 by erroneously replacing the head of the results with an older engine 
instance, when there are enough engine instances to overflow a single page of 
Elasticsearch hits.

I've observed this buggy behavior after ten trainings, when enough engine 
instances are stored to trigger Elasticsearch's scroll feature.

I'll be opening a pull request shortly with the super-simple fix.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to