Re: Nov 2016 Podling Report

Filed the Report. @akpurtell please sign-off on the same. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote: > +1, will go ahead and file the report. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >

Re: Nov 2016 Podling Report

+1, will go ahead and file the report. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review the following report. If this is good to go, please feel free > to go ahead and put this on the incubator wiki. > > Regards, > Donald > > --- > >

[jira] [Assigned] (PIO-39) All *.md files are missing Apache License headers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suneel Marthi reassigned PIO-39: Assignee: Suneel Marthi > All *.md files are missing Apache License head

[jira] [Updated] (PIO-39) All *.md files are missing Apache License headers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suneel Marthi updated PIO-39: - Summary: All *.md files are missing Apache License headers (was: README is missing Apache License header

Re: Oct 2016 Podling Report

Podlings r now on Quarterly reporting schedule, see http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt PIO report is not due until November, so don't sweat much on the podling report for October. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review the

Re: Remove engine registration

This is how the Flink guys are doing it - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65870673 They call them FLIP (Flink Improvement Process) similar to KLIP in Kafka. You could use a shared google doc as well as the Wiki and Mailing lists. Make sure that the Wiki is the

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

e.org> wrote: > > Yes. Many of them are sources, docs, poms and signatures though. > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > So all of these artifacts need to be verified and validated ? > > > > https://rep

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

ging repo should contain just > PredictionIO artifacts. > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > the MAven staging repo brings up whole load of artifacts, which ones r we > > voting on again ? > > > > On Mon, Sep 1

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

hich of the two votes you mean. For the > podling > > >> vote, PPMC votes are binding, for the incubator vote, IPMC votes are, > > > no? > > >> > > >>> On Sep 15, 2016 9:42 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <andrew.purt...@gmail.com > > >

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

an. For the > podling > > >> vote, PPMC votes are binding, for the incubator vote, IPMC votes are, > > > no? > > >> > > >>> On Sep 15, 2016 9:42 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <andrew.purt...@gmail.com > > > <javascript:;>> wrote: >

Re: Release Manager

Oh yeah the quick install from http://predictionio.incubator.apache.org/install/install-linux/ didn't work for me before too. On OS X, only option 4 from bin/install.sh works. I am trying this on Fedora now. On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote: &

Re: Release Manager

I was trying the install.sh (quick install version) from here last night (this is on a Mac) and it wouldn't work, possible that it was midnight blues playing on me. On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Thanks Donald! > > We still need to cleanup 2

Re: Binary or Source release

e with current > build system out the door in a first Apache release. > +1 and we all seem to agree for a quick source-only first release. > > On Sep 5, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Its easy to do what Andy is describin

Re: Binary or Source release

Its easy to do what Andy is describing using maven's assembly plugin in the maven world. I have no experience with sbt so can't speak to how it can be done with Sbt and would defer that to the experts. We hit a similar issue with licenses in source and binary on the first Pirk release last week.

[jira] [Updated] (PIO-27) Check release artifacts for licenses and the LICENSE.txt file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suneel Marthi updated PIO-27: - Description: Quote [~smarthi] " I would ask that you do the due diligence on the License and Notice

[jira] [Commented] (PIO-27) Check release artifacts for licenses and the LICENSE.txt file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15461870#comment-15461870 ] Suneel Marthi commented on PIO-27: -- I agree that for the first Apache PIO release its easier to do a source

[jira] [Commented] (PIO-27) Check release artifacts for licenses and the LICENSE.txt file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15461724#comment-15461724 ] Suneel Marthi commented on PIO-27: -- Not sure how its done with sbt ? But with maven - mvn dependency:tree

[jira] [Commented] (PIO-27) Check release artifacts for licenses and the LICENSE.txt file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15461642#comment-15461642 ] Suneel Marthi commented on PIO-27: -- Quote: "After reading the Apache guidelines, it sounds like if we

Re: Sep 2016 Podling report

Filed the podling report for Sep 2016. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org> wrote: > Looks good to me. Thanks Suneel and Pat! > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Please find below the propo

Sep 2016 Podling report

Please find below the proposed Podling PIO report for Sep 2016, let me know of any changes/additions you would like to make. Apache PredictionIO (Incubating) Apache PredictionIO (incubating) is an open source Machine Learning Server built on top of

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2016

I posted a outline draft here for others to fill in - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ktBY0mUxT1GW42Oq2howNmJZea2xj8PKVXxAPSIetJE/edit On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Time to report to the Board and IPMC. Do we have a volunteer from the PPMC >

Re: Apache PIO v0.10.0 release

While waiting on #1 below, I would ask that you do the due diligence on the License and Notice files and ensure that all third party jars have been accounted for and the License and Notice files are included in the appropriate project release artifacts. On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Pat Ferrel

Re: templates

I concur with Andy. On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > I don't think you should author code in the org.apache namespace that has > not gone through proper IP clearance channels. This came up with Gearpump > before it went into incubation. They

[jira] [Commented] (PIO-26) Integrate Apache RAT for license checking

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15428789#comment-15428789 ] Suneel Marthi commented on PIO-26: -- If folks don't mind I would like to work on this. > Integrate Apa

[jira] [Updated] (PIO-26) Integrate Apache RAT for license checking

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suneel Marthi updated PIO-26: - Assignee: (was: Suneel Marthi) > Integrate Apache RAT for license check

[jira] [Assigned] (PIO-26) Integrate Apache RAT for license checking

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suneel Marthi reassigned PIO-26: Assignee: Suneel Marthi > Integrate Apache RAT for license check