Re: Github action migration Discussion

Thanks @Guangning E contribution, The changes LGTM +1 -- Thanks Xiaolong Ran > 在 2020年1月14日，上午11:05，Guangning E 写道： > > After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than > Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and > insufficient resources. The

Re: Github action migration Discussion

+1 On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 08:36, Guangning E wrote: > > After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than > Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and > insufficient resources. The committer cannot trigger the test. > > Jenkins:

Github action migration Discussion

After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and insufficient resources. The committer cannot trigger the test. Jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/job/pulsar_precommit_java8/ Github action:

Re: [VOTE] Accept DotPulsar as part of Apache Pulsar project

+1,  Thanks, Guangning xiaolong ran 于2020年1月14日周二 上午10:15写道： > Thanks Danske contribution, LGTM +1 > > -- > Thanks > Xiaolong Ran > > > 在 2020年1月13日，下午9:06，Sijie Guo 写道： > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to start a vote thread for accepting DotPulsar [1] as part of > > Apache Pulsar

Re: [VOTE] Accept DotPulsar as part of Apache Pulsar project

Thanks Danske contribution, LGTM +1 -- Thanks Xiaolong Ran > 在 2020年1月13日，下午9:06，Sijie Guo 写道： > > Hi all, > > I'd like to start a vote thread for accepting DotPulsar [1] as part of > Apache Pulsar project. DotPulsar is a pulsar client library for .NET which > was originally developed by

[VOTE] Accept DotPulsar as part of Apache Pulsar project

Hi all, I'd like to start a vote thread for accepting DotPulsar [1] as part of Apache Pulsar project. DotPulsar is a pulsar client library for .NET which was originally developed by Danske Commodities A/S Please vote with your

Re: [DISCUSS] Contribute DotPulsar to Apache Pulsar

It seems that there is no objections to accepting this repo. I will start an official vote in a separate email thread. On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 1:09 PM xiaolong ran wrote: > Daniel: > > Thank you for everything you’ve done. very nice work. > > The change LGTM +1 > > -- > Thanks > Xiaolong Ran >

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.5.0 Candidate 2

+1 OS: MacOS 10.15.2 - verified packages checksum and signatures ( asc and sha all good) - the source package rat check, licence check, build and unit test all run successfully. - bin package build from source, 'bin/pulsar standalone' and client produce/consume runs well. - bin package,

Re: Pulsar Release 2.4.3 Discussion

Guangning, Thank you for bringing this up to the community and thanks for volunteering the release. However, I think there is one problem needs to be addressed for release 2.4.3 - how to label the fixes for 2.4.3? I am assuming those tasks that need to be cherry-picked to 2.4.3 are already

Re: Flaky tests [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.5.0 Candidate 2

There are a fair amount of flaky tests. Guangning has identified most of the flaky tests when working on github action tasks. If you checkout those github action files, you can find them. Thanks, Sijie On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 5:46 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > (out of the VOTE thread) > I have

Pulsar Release 2.4.3 Discussion

Hi everyone, There are a few bug fixes and enhancement for 2.4.2. And the planned 2.4.3 the release has past due by a few days. It would be good to start cut the release soon. I would like to volunteer for releasing 2.4.3. Thanks, Guangning

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.5.0 Candidate 2

+1 (non-binding) - validate the checksum of the src, bin and connectors packages - compile the source code successfully - validate pub/sub and functions - validate connectors Regards, Yong On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 20:02, Sijie Guo wrote: > This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar,

Slack digest for #dev - 2020-01-13

2020-01-12 14:05:34 UTC - Jon Stern: @Jon Stern has joined the channel