Re: [VOTE]Github action migration

2020-01-14 Thread lan.liang
+1 nb - lan.liang On 1/15/2020 15:50,Yuva raj wrote: +1 On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 7:40 AM Guangning E wrote: Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the test to Github action as soon as possible. I'd like to start a vote thread for migration tests from Jenkins

Re: [VOTE]Github action migration

2020-01-14 Thread Yuva raj
+1 On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 7:40 AM Guangning E wrote: > Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the > test to Github action as soon as possible. I'd like to start a vote thread > for migration tests from Jenkins to Github action > > Please vote with your opinions. The

Re: [VOTE]Github action migration

2020-01-14 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 (non binding) I hope we can do the same in Apache Bookkeeper Enrico Il mer 15 gen 2020, 04:34 xiaolong ran ha scritto: > LGTM +1 > > -- > Thanks > Xiaolong Ran > > > 在 2020年1月15日,上午10:10,Guangning E 写道: > > > > Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the > >

[RESULTS] [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.5.0 Candidate 2

2020-01-14 Thread Sijie Guo
Hi all, The vote is now closed with 6 +1, 0 +0, and 0 -1. In the 6 +1 votes: 3 binding votes: - Jia Zhai - Penghui Li - Sijie Guo 3 non-binding votes: - Guangning E - Xiaolong Ran - Yong Zhang Thanks, Sijie On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 8:02 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > This is the second release

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.5.0 Candidate 2

2020-01-14 Thread Sijie Guo
Add my own +1 On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 8:52 PM Jia Zhai wrote: > +1 > > > OS: MacOS 10.15.2 > > > - verified packages checksum and signatures ( asc and sha all good) > > - the source package rat check, licence check, build and unit test all run > successfully. > > - bin package build from

Re: [VOTE]Github action migration

2020-01-14 Thread xiaolong ran
LGTM +1 -- Thanks Xiaolong Ran > 在 2020年1月15日,上午10:10,Guangning E 写道: > > Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the > test to Github action as soon as possible. I'd like to start a vote thread > for migration tests from Jenkins to Github action > > Please vote

Re: [VOTE]Github action migration

2020-01-14 Thread Sijie Guo
+1 On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:16 AM Guangning E wrote: > The discussion is here > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff18ec60c9838cd69adee2840ead9cf8ee7cb6331c61845ad93e776e%40%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E > > Guangning E 于2020年1月15日周三 上午10:10写道: > > > Now pulsar's pull request is blocked

Re: [VOTE]Github action migration

2020-01-14 Thread Guangning E
The discussion is here https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff18ec60c9838cd69adee2840ead9cf8ee7cb6331c61845ad93e776e%40%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E Guangning E 于2020年1月15日周三 上午10:10写道: > Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the > test to Github action as soon as

[VOTE]Github action migration

2020-01-14 Thread Guangning E
Now pulsar's pull request is blocked on the test. We hope to migrate the test to Github action as soon as possible. I'd like to start a vote thread for migration tests from Jenkins to Github action Please vote with your opinions. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Guangning

PIP-55: Refresh Authentication Credentials

2020-01-14 Thread Matteo Merli
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-55%3A-Refresh-Authentication-Credentials - ## Goals Enhance the Pulsar Authentication framework to support credentials that expire over time and need to be refreshed by forcing clients to re-authenticate. Typical examples are:

[Pulsar Community Weekly Update] 2020-01-04 ~ 2020-01-10

2020-01-14 Thread Yu Liu
Dear Pulsar enthusiast, This is the Pulsar community weekly update for 2020-01-04 ~ 2020-01-10, with updates on key-hash range reader and multiple critical bug fixes around broker and storage. *This Pulsar community weekly update is available at

Re: [Discuss] Create alpha tag in pulsar-client-go

2020-01-14 Thread Sijie Guo
If the tag is used for developing the Go Functions for 2.6.0, that should be fine. +1 from me On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:00 PM xiaolong ran wrote: > Hello all committers: > > Currently, the Go Functions depends on the cgo client, users need to > build pulse-client-cpp before using. This is a

Re: Github action migration Discussion

2020-01-14 Thread Sijie Guo
+1 Github has more resources to run CI jobs as the contributions keep growing. On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:06 AM Guangning E wrote: > After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than > Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and > insufficient resources.

Re: [VOTE] Accept DotPulsar as part of Apache Pulsar project

2020-01-14 Thread Joe F
+1 On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:36 AM Yu Liu wrote: > +1  > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:19 AM Guangning E wrote: > > > +1,  > > > > Thanks, > > Guangning > > > > xiaolong ran 于2020年1月14日周二 上午10:15写道: > > > > > Thanks Danske contribution, LGTM +1 > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks > > > Xiaolong

[Discuss] Create alpha tag in pulsar-client-go

2020-01-14 Thread xiaolong ran
Hello all committers: Currently, the Go Functions depends on the cgo client, users need to build pulse-client-cpp before using. This is a bad experience for Go Functions. Fortunately, we are already developing a client based on native go(https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go

Re: [VOTE] Accept DotPulsar as part of Apache Pulsar project

2020-01-14 Thread Yu Liu
+1  On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:19 AM Guangning E wrote: > +1,  > > Thanks, > Guangning > > xiaolong ran 于2020年1月14日周二 上午10:15写道: > > > Thanks Danske contribution, LGTM +1 > > > > -- > > Thanks > > Xiaolong Ran > > > > > 在 2020年1月13日,下午9:06,Sijie Guo 写道: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] sijie commented on issue #63: Avoid passphrase request ?

2020-01-14 Thread GitBox
sijie commented on issue #63: Avoid passphrase request ? URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/63#issuecomment-574139362 @cristiandley can you describe a bit more about your steps? This is an automated

Re: Github action migration Discussion

2020-01-14 Thread Yu Liu
+1 Especially for doc PRs. Passing all Jenkins tests eats up much time. On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:15 PM Jinfeng Huang wrote: > +1 > Currently, a large number of PRs are blocked by Jenkins. > > Best Regards, > Jennifer > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:06 AM Guangning E wrote: > > > After a

Slack digest for #dev - 2020-01-14

2020-01-14 Thread Apache Pulsar Slack
2020-01-13 17:43:46 UTC - curdin: @curdin has joined the channel 2020-01-13 18:44:07 UTC - ravi satya durga prasad Yenugula: @ravi satya durga prasad Yenugula has joined the channel 2020-01-13 19:16:02 UTC - adobewjl: @adobewjl has joined the channel 2020-01-14 00:09:46 UTC - Ali

Re: Github action migration Discussion

2020-01-14 Thread Jinfeng Huang
+1 Currently, a large number of PRs are blocked by Jenkins. Best Regards, Jennifer On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:06 AM Guangning E wrote: > After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than > Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and > insufficient