Re: [VOTE] PIP-276: Add metric `pulsar_topic_load_times

+1(binding) Best, Mattison On 20 Jun 2023 at 10:45 +0800, PengHui Li , wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Penghui > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:40 AM Yubiao Feng > wrote: > > > Voting +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks > > Yubiao Feng > > > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:21 PM Asaf Mesika wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-276: Add metric `pulsar_topic_load_times

+1 (binding) Thanks, Penghui On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:40 AM Yubiao Feng wrote: > Voting +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks > Yubiao Feng > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:21 PM Asaf Mesika wrote: > > > Voting +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:23 PM guo jiwei wrote: > > > > > @Asaf

Re: [VOTE] PIP-276: Add metric `pulsar_topic_load_times

Voting +1 (non-binding) Thanks Yubiao Feng On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:21 PM Asaf Mesika wrote: > Voting +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:23 PM guo jiwei wrote: > > > @Asaf Thanks, I have addressed the comment. > > > > Regards > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023

Re: [VOTE] PIP-275: Introduce topicOrderedExecutorThreadNum to deprecate numWorkerThreadsForNonPersistentTopic in configuration

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno lun 19 giu 2023 alle ore 14:48 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > > +1 (non binding) > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:19 AM 丛搏 wrote: > > > +1(binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Bo > > > > houxiaoyu 于2023年6月19日周一 14:04写道： > > > > > > Hi, community: > > > > > > This thread is to

Re: Improving the usability of the bookie Isolation feature

I want to add only one step to your plan. If you introduce this flag in Y.X, then in Y.(X+1), let's remove this flag and keep the "true" value as the behavior. On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 4:57 AM horizonzy wrote: > Background > > In the Pulsar, it has two features: > >- > >The first

Re: [VOTE] PIP-275: Introduce topicOrderedExecutorThreadNum to deprecate numWorkerThreadsForNonPersistentTopic in configuration

+1 (non binding) On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:19 AM 丛搏 wrote: > +1(binding) > > Thanks, > Bo > > houxiaoyu 于2023年6月19日周一 14:04写道： > > > > Hi, community: > > > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-275: Introduce > > topicOrderedExecutorThreadNum to deprecate > >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-267: Support multi-topic messageId deserialization to ack messages

First, let me add some data that should be added to the Background section of the PIP since I had to reverse engineer the code to understand that, which is the opposite of the goal of a design document. Pulsar Broker has a binary protocol, which allows the client to consume messages,

Re: [VOTE] PIP-276: Add metric `pulsar_topic_load_times

Voting +1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:23 PM guo jiwei wrote: > @Asaf Thanks, I have addressed the comment. > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:55 AM Asaf Mesika wrote: > > > -1 (non-binding) > > > > I'm perfectly ok with the idea; just please fix the

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable "Always suggest updating pull request branches" for pulsar-site

FYI - the proposal is applied https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24636. On 2023/06/02 02:25:55 Dave Fisher wrote: > I think that INFRA would accept a DISCUSSION that looks for LAZY CONSENSUS. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jun 1, 2023, at 7:18 PM, tison wrote: > > > > While we can

Re: [VOTE] PIP-275: Introduce topicOrderedExecutorThreadNum to deprecate numWorkerThreadsForNonPersistentTopic in configuration

+1(binding) Thanks, Bo houxiaoyu 于2023年6月19日周一 14:04写道： > > Hi, community: > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-275: Introduce > topicOrderedExecutorThreadNum to deprecate > numWorkerThreadsForNonPersistentTopic in configuration. > > Discussion thread: >

[VOTE] PIP-275: Introduce topicOrderedExecutorThreadNum to deprecate numWorkerThreadsForNonPersistentTopic in configuration

Hi, community: This thread is to start a vote for PIP-275: Introduce topicOrderedExecutorThreadNum to deprecate numWorkerThreadsForNonPersistentTopic in configuration. Discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/hx8v824v5wdoz3kn44s4t9pzgfnqkt1o PIP-PR: