Hi Yu,
This is a good idea, I noticed this thread for a long time.
This PR title looks like convention message[1], it should be variant. If we use
the convention message, we can focus on other things, and reduce time on these
tools, but the developer gets used to the current standard. If we don
tisonkun commented on issue #146:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/issues/146#issuecomment-1201036280
* Beam shows their matrix as:
https://beam.apache.org/documentation/runners/capability-matrix/
* Elastic shows their matrix as: https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix
--
T
Sum up the ideas above:
* Keep it as is @penghui
* Extend the interval @dave
* Change the message @eolivelli
* Remove the message @zixuan
I may try to remove the stale bot at the beginning, but when I consider it
more constructively, the goal here is that we'd like to nudge the ping-pong
circle b
Hi Penghui,
Thanks for your feed.
I have added them, please see the proposal again.
Thanks,
Cong Zhao
On 2022/07/29 05:08:10 PengHui Li wrote:
> We should also add a part for observability. Add some metrics to the delayed
> index buckets and snapshots will help users to tune the
> configuration
+1 (binding)
On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> Hi, Pulsar community,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
>
> You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16739 and
> the discussion thread at
> https://lists.apache.org/thre
kponichtera commented on issue #451:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/451#issuecomment-1201696167
I lost half a day trying to figure out why `user.management.enable` property
doesn't work for me - the user specified by `pulsar-manager.account` didn't
work for me at all.
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Mattison
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 01:56, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 2022/07/28 10:39:35 Christophe Bornet wrote:
> > Hi, Pulsar community,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on PIP-193 : Sink preprocessing Function
> >
> > You can find the proposal at https://gi
Dear Pulsar Community,
Please review and vote on this PIP.
PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16691
Thank you,
-Heesung
I agreed with @tison, LGTM
Thanks,
Zixuan
tison 于2022年8月1日周一 23:07写道:
> Sum up the ideas above:
>
> * Keep it as is @penghui
> * Extend the interval @dave
> * Change the message @eolivelli
> * Remove the message @zixuan
>
> I may try to remove the stale bot at the beginning, but when I conside
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 12:59 PM Anon Hxy wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaoyu Hou
>
> Haiting Jiang 于2022年8月1日周一 10:23写道:
>
> > Dear Community,
> >
> > I would like to restart the VOTE on "PIP-180: Shadow Topic, an
> alternative
> > way to support readonly topic ownership.
10 matches
Mail list logo