Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.0 candidate 4

2021-11-22 Thread Matteo Merli
+1 binding Checked: * Signatures * Bin distribution: - NOTICE, README, LICENSE - Start standalone service and producer/consumer test * Src distribution: - NOTICE, README, LICENSE - Compile and unit tests - Start standalone service * Checked staging maven repository

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.0 candidate 4

2021-11-22 Thread PengHui Li
+1 (binding) Follow the "Release Candidate Validation": - start standalone - create tenants and namespaces - publish and consume messages - cassandra connector - function and stateful function Done the performance test, no performance degradation. Best regards Penghui On Mon, Nov 22, 2021

Re: [DISCUSS] New repository for website - pulsar-site

2021-11-22 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il Gio 18 Nov 2021, 20:32 Dave Fisher ha scritto: > I’m making progress here, but I need help getting the pulsarbot GH secret > into the pulsar-site repository. > You have to open a INFRA ticket Enrico > If that secret can be shared directly to me then I can fully test before > adding my PR.

Re: [DISCUSS] New repository for website - pulsar-site

2021-11-22 Thread Dave Fisher
How might the planned move of various components and adaptors out of the main repository impact the choice to have the docs in the main repository? > On Nov 17, 2021, at 12:25 PM, Matteo Merli wrote: > > I agree with that. > > I understand that there are tradeoffs for each approach, though

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] PetterIsberg commented on issue #84: Recover after network disconnect

2021-11-22 Thread GitBox
PetterIsberg commented on issue #84: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/84#issuecomment-975717538 @blankensteiner We're grateful that you take time to look into this and I'm sorry for not helping out on this further. I'm looking through the code now and can see

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Jiwei Guo

2021-11-22 Thread Aaron Williams
Congratulations! Thanks for all of your hard work to Apache Pulsar and its community! Aaron On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 6:37 AM Ran Gao wrote: > Congrats Jiwei! > > Ran > > On 2021/11/22 04:35:08 PengHui Li wrote: > > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Jiwei > Guo > >

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Jiwei Guo

2021-11-22 Thread Haiting Jiang
Congratulations! --- Thanks Haiting Jiang On 2021/11/22 04:35:08 PengHui Li wrote: > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Jiwei Guo > https://github.com/Technoboy- to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce > that he has accepted. > > Jiwei has joined the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.0 candidate 4

2021-11-22 Thread Ran Gao
Hi Enrico, Thanks for your great work! We also make some chaos tests for 2.9.0 candidate 4. We opened a new Pulsar cluster based on 2.9.0-candidate-4 and injected some chaos experiments by chaos-mesh, such as broker pod failure, kill, and zookeeper pod failure, in this process, the entire

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Jiwei Guo

2021-11-22 Thread Ran Gao
Congrats Jiwei! Ran On 2021/11/22 04:35:08 PengHui Li wrote: > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Jiwei Guo > https://github.com/Technoboy- to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce > that he has accepted. > > Jiwei has joined the community for more

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Jiwei Guo

2021-11-22 Thread Ruguo Yu
Congratulations! Thanks, Ruguo Yu On 2021/11/22 04:35:08 PengHui Li wrote: > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Jiwei Guo > https://github.com/Technoboy- to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce > that he has accepted. > > Jiwei has

RE: [DISCUSS] The processing of residual scheam and the convergence of schema operation auth

2021-11-22 Thread PengHui Li
+1 Penghui On Nov 19, 2021, 2:29 AM +0800, Neng Lu , wrote: > +1 for dropping the schema when a topic is deleted by default. > > I previously met a strange error that after creating a topic with the same > name as previous deleted topic, the "ghost" schema is associated with the new > topic

Re: Stop cherry-picking patches to released branch

2021-11-22 Thread PengHui Li
Hi Enrico, I think we should cherry-pick the bug fixes, enhancements and test improvements? Only the new features and document should not cherry-pick release branch. And, do you see any issues introduced in release branch from the cherry-picking? Thanks, Penghui On Nov 22, 2021, 5:38 PM +0800,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Jiwei Guo

2021-11-22 Thread ZhangJian He
Congratulations Thnaks ZhangJian He 陳智弘 于2021年11月22日周一 下午7:52写道: > Congratulations! > > guo jiwei 於 2021年11月22日 週一 14:17 寫道: > > > Thanks to the community and to all the people who have helped me. I will > > continue to work hard. > > > > > > Regards > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > > > > On Mon,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Jiwei Guo

2021-11-22 Thread 陳智弘
Congratulations! guo jiwei 於 2021年11月22日 週一 14:17 寫道: > Thanks to the community and to all the people who have helped me. I will > continue to work hard. > > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 2:07 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Congrats! > > > > Enrico > > > > Il

Stop cherry-picking patches to released branch

2021-11-22 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello, I believe that we should not cherry-pick changes to released branches (branch-2.x) if there is no strong reason to do it. I think that the only types of fixes that are eligible for cherry-picks are: - security issues - fixes for regressions - fixes for serious bugs (but the change is not