Good.
I will send an email to u...@pulsar.apache.org that states the EOL
status for 2.6
Enrico
Il giorno lun 10 gen 2022 alle ore 19:26 Chris Herzog
ha scritto:
>
> I agree with 2.6 EOL.
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 2:35 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> > This thread is now to moving branch-2.6
I agree with 2.6 EOL.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 2:35 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> This thread is now to moving branch-2.6 (the Pulsar 2.6 release line)
> to End-Of-Life status
>
> What EOL means here:
> - No more releases, even for security bugs
> - No cherry-picks to branch-2.6
>
> We will apply
This thread is now to moving branch-2.6 (the Pulsar 2.6 release line)
to End-Of-Life status
What EOL means here:
- No more releases, even for security bugs
- No cherry-picks to branch-2.6
We will apply the Lazy Consensus rules
https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
If
I agree with Dave. Lazy consensus gives us exactly what we need: to
know if someone would like branch-2.6 to stay alive. If no one
responds that they need it within the time period, then no one needs
it.
PIP 47 briefly mentions our EOL policy, but the policy doesn't cover
our current case where
This project VOTEs on more things than any Apache project I’ve been involved
with during the last 14 years.
For most projects lazy consensus applies:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
We also tend to “vote” during discussions which does not really advance a
Agree to have a vote to keep a record.
- Sijie
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:40 PM 陳智弘 wrote:
> I think having a vote and quickly announce the EOF of 2.6.x will be better
> to the community.
>
>
> Dave Fisher 於 2022年1月4日 週二 06:06 寫道：
>
> > I don’t think we need a VOTE. Let’s do this by LAZY
I think having a vote and quickly announce the EOF of 2.6.x will be better
to the community.
Dave Fisher 於 2022年1月4日 週二 06:06 寫道：
> I don’t think we need a VOTE. Let’s do this by LAZY CONSENSUS.
>
> > On Jan 3, 2022, at 10:05 AM, Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > We are no more
I don’t think we need a VOTE. Let’s do this by LAZY CONSENSUS.
> On Jan 3, 2022, at 10:05 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Hello,
> We are no more cutting releases out of branch-2.6
>
> We must declare 2.6 EOF.
>
> IIUC there is no process established for this at the moment in the Pulsar
>
Hello,
We are no more cutting releases out of branch-2.6
We must declare 2.6 EOF.
IIUC there is no process established for this at the moment in the Pulsar
project.
So for this time I will call out a VOTE next week, as we did not cut
releases for a few important bugs.
Thoughts?
Enrico
