Re: Pulsar now using standard Apache BookKeeper

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Joe Francis wrote: > taking BK dev off this.. > > Pulsar storage has to be rock stable at all times. I will make a few > suggestions to that end. > > Note that there is a direct conflict of interests here. For new > installations, they

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar 1.22.0-incubating Release Candidate 3

Hi Stian, thanks for the detailed spot-on review. (comments inline). I have created an issue to track the point you have raised ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/issues/1337), we'll get to these before next release. On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:00 AM Stian Soiland-Reyes

Re: Pulsar now using standard Apache BookKeeper

taking BK dev off this.. Pulsar storage has to be rock stable at all times. I will make a few suggestions to that end. Note that there is a direct conflict of interests here. For new installations, they have no baggage and would like the latest/greatest features. But for users who are already

Jenkins build is back to normal : pulsar_release_nightly_snapshot #8

See

Re: Pulsar now using standard Apache BookKeeper

> Keep in mind the next Pulsar release needs to be based on a particular > BookKeeper release. An Apache project cannot release against another > project's SNAPSHOT since that has not been validated by their release process. The bookkeeper 4.7.0 release process should be starting soon, so it