Sorry there was a typo in my previous email:
"v2.2.1-incubating-candidate-1" => "v2.1.1-incubating-candidate-1"
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 5:31 PM Jerry Peng
wrote:
> This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version
> 2.1.1-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
+1
Very nicely done!
Best,
Jerry
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:20 AM Rajan Dhabalia wrote:
> +1.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajan
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 5, 2018, at 5:36 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for sending out at very last minute (deadline is today). Please
> take
> > a look.
> >
This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version
2.1.1-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/milestone/17?closed=1
Mostly bug fixes for 2.1.0
*** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay
open for at least
+1.
Thanks,
Rajan
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 5, 2018, at 5:36 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> Sorry for sending out at very last minute (deadline is today). Please take
> a look.
>
> I have added a paragraph regarding the branding discussion that happen in
> early June (as discussed with
+1 looks good
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
> Sorry for sending out at very last minute (deadline is today). Please take
> a look.
>
> I have added a paragraph regarding the branding discussion that happen in
> early June (as discussed with Taylor then) since the previous
That said, it is stored in Json so it wouldn't be much work to sort
one of the values as a list of strings.
-Ivan
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> PIP updated. The one thing that isn't 100% clean with the dynamic
> configuration keys is that they only support string as
PIP updated. The one thing that isn't 100% clean with the dynamic
configuration keys is that they only support string as value, so the
list of revoked keys needs some sort of serialization.
-Ivan
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Rajan
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Rajan Dhabalia wrote:
>> I will consider both this and system topics and update the PIP.
>
> I think we should avoid more complexity by introducing system topic to
> store "subject key" and then process it. Instead we can store it to
> global/config zk as it
lgtm +!
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> +1 looks good
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:36 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
>
>> Sorry for sending out at very last minute (deadline is today). Please take
>> a look.
>>
>> I have added a paragraph regarding the branding discussion
that should be +1
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> lgtm +!
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>> +1 looks good
>>
>> - Sijie
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:36 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry for sending out at very last minute (deadline is today).
+1 looks good
- Sijie
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:36 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
> Sorry for sending out at very last minute (deadline is today). Please take
> a look.
>
> I have added a paragraph regarding the branding discussion that happen in
> early June (as discussed with Taylor then) since the
11 matches
Mail list logo