Glad you are watching.
I agree on the performance question.
We should ask to be included in any grandfathering and/or timed replacement. (A
timed replacement was done for a particular JSON library that a lot of projects
were using.)
Regards,
Dave
> On Jun 30, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Matteo Merli
Yes, I have been following the same LEGAL-303 Jira.
At this point, RocksDB is a required dependency. It would not be hard to
have it optional and by default not included/required and provide
instruction (with licenssing warning) on the website on how to add support
for it.
The difference would be
Hi -
I was exploring the project in GitHub and I noticed a reference to RocksDB. As
part of an Apache project it is important to make sure that all of the required
dependencies have licenses that are compatible with the Apache License 2.0 and
also that those licenses do not in anyway interfere
