Dave,
I have reworded a bit the "becoming committer" section by adding this
paragraph:
Every new committer has to be proposed by a current committer and then
privately discussed and voted in by the members of the Pulsar PMC.
For details about this process and for candidate requirements
+1from me. Nice work.
-Taylor
> On Aug 30, 2018, at 5:32 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> I have reworded a bit the "becoming committer" section by adding this
> paragraph:
>
>
> Every new committer has to be proposed by a current committer and then
> privately discussed and
+1 from me as well.
Regards,
Dave
> On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> +1from me. Nice work.
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On Aug 30, 2018, at 5:32 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> I have reworded a bit the "becoming committer" section by adding this
>> paragraph:
>>
>>
For the record, I’m supportive of graduation for Pulsar at this point.
I think the branding debacle and the maturity model self-assessment has forced
some good introspection on the part of the PPMC in terms of what’s expected of
them as a TLP, and I think they are ready.
I would like to see a
Thanks both David and Taylor for the support. I think too that it would be
good to have few mentors continuing being involved in the project.
Once the "contributing" PR is merged and the website is updated (we're
waiting on Jenkins to come back up at this point), then I will start the
VOTE thread
2018-08-29 09:41:20 UTC - Mark Addison: @Mark Addison has joined the channel
