Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 September 2018, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will
+1
-Taylor
> On Sep 2, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> Updated the initial draft by removing paragraph on the "have a tasking for
> creating set of bylaws".
>
>
>
> Establish the Apache Pulsar Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors
Sentence got cut when sending : (Updated the initial draft by removing
paragraph on "task to adopt a set of bylaws")
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 12:22 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1 (binding)! :)
>
> > On Sep 2, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
> >
> > Updated the initial draft by removing
+1 (binding)! :)
> On Sep 2, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> Updated the initial draft by removing paragraph on the "have a tasking for
> creating set of bylaws".
>
>
>
> Establish the Apache Pulsar Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of
Updated the initial draft by removing paragraph on the "have a tasking for
creating set of bylaws".
Establish the Apache Pulsar Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 11:59 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Matteo -
>
> The BookKeeper bylaws are a problem in that the PMC Emeritus process is
> not the Apache Way. Merit does not expire and numerous projects would be in
> trouble if those were the wide rules. It may not cause trouble for a PMC in
Hi Matteo -
The BookKeeper bylaws are a problem in that the PMC Emeritus process is not the
Apache Way. Merit does not expire and numerous projects would be in trouble if
those were the wide rules. It may not cause trouble for a PMC in the future.
Not now as everything is good, but sooner or
Thanks Dave for asking the question in bigger forum.
As mentioned, for the draft, I just followed the text suggested by the
whimsy tool, which I've seen included in multiple recent resolutions.
My understanding of that paragraph is that "once the PMC is formed one of
its first tasks would be to
I would agree. I think that we should NOT add anything about PMC specific
bylaws in our resolution. I would even go so far as to vote -1 on the
resolution with that clause included.
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 4:16 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> I would like to stay on as well.
>
> Quick question:
