RE: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release

[Nozomi Kurihara]

Hi All,

I will start to prepare for the next 1.21 release and the target date is 11/15.

Please let me know If there are changes that should be included or the date 
seems unreasonable.

Thanks,
Nozomi


差出人: Nozomi Kurihara <nkuri...@yahoo-corp.jp>
送信日時: 2017年10月27日 18:35:49
宛先: dev@pulsar.incubator.apache.org
件名: RE: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release

Hi Joe,


I see and then I will be the release manager.


Thanks.


Nozomi


差出人: Joe Francis <j...@oath.com.INVALID>
送信日時: 2017年10月27日 12:42:59
宛先: dev@pulsar.incubator.apache.org
件名: Re: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release

That's great that YJ is going to drive 1.21.  But we would still need one
dev as the Release Manager, who will need to get the personal  key verified
.

Joe

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Nozomi Kurihara <nkuri...@yahoo-corp.jp>
wrote:

> Hi Matteo,
>
>
> > Even though it's mostly fixes, I think it would still make sense to call
> the release 1.21.0 rather than 1.20.1.
>
>
> I think so too.
>
>
> > Anyone wants to volunteer as a release manager?
>
>
> If there are no objections, Yahoo! Japan pulsar team would like to be a
> release manager for the next release.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Nozomi
>
>
> 
> 差出人: Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>
> 送信日時: 2017年10月27日 6:00:22
> 宛先: dev@pulsar.incubator.apache.org
> 件名: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release
>
> Hi all,
>
> since we have released pulsar-1.20.0-incubating, a lot of fixes have been
> committed.
> Though we don't have many new features, some of the fixes or improvements
> are significant and I think it would be good to create a release so that
> people trying out Pulsar won't encounter them.
>
> In particular, I'm thinking of :
>  * Enhancements to Kafka API wrapper to have it work with Kafka's own
> benchmark tools
>  * Fix to C++ partitioned consumer client
>  * Several fixes and improvements related to the namespace bundles
>
> Even though it's mostly fixes, I think it would still make sense to call
> the release 1.21.0 rather than 1.20.1.
>
> My opinion would be to close the 1.21 soon (~1week timeframe). Please
> propose any changes that you think should get included.
>
> Thoughts? Anyone wants to volunteer as a release manager?
>
>
> Matteo
> --
> Matteo Merli
> <mme...@apache.org>
>

RE: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release

[Nozomi Kurihara]

Hi Joe,


I see and then I will be the release manager.


Thanks.


Nozomi


差出人: Joe Francis <j...@oath.com.INVALID>
送信日時: 2017年10月27日 12:42:59
宛先: dev@pulsar.incubator.apache.org
件名: Re: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release

That's great that YJ is going to drive 1.21.  But we would still need one
dev as the Release Manager, who will need to get the personal  key verified
.

Joe

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Nozomi Kurihara <nkuri...@yahoo-corp.jp>
wrote:

> Hi Matteo,
>
>
> > Even though it's mostly fixes, I think it would still make sense to call
> the release 1.21.0 rather than 1.20.1.
>
>
> I think so too.
>
>
> > Anyone wants to volunteer as a release manager?
>
>
> If there are no objections, Yahoo! Japan pulsar team would like to be a
> release manager for the next release.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Nozomi
>
>
> 
> 差出人: Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>
> 送信日時: 2017年10月27日 6:00:22
> 宛先: dev@pulsar.incubator.apache.org
> 件名: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release
>
> Hi all,
>
> since we have released pulsar-1.20.0-incubating, a lot of fixes have been
> committed.
> Though we don't have many new features, some of the fixes or improvements
> are significant and I think it would be good to create a release so that
> people trying out Pulsar won't encounter them.
>
> In particular, I'm thinking of :
>  * Enhancements to Kafka API wrapper to have it work with Kafka's own
> benchmark tools
>  * Fix to C++ partitioned consumer client
>  * Several fixes and improvements related to the namespace bundles
>
> Even though it's mostly fixes, I think it would still make sense to call
> the release 1.21.0 rather than 1.20.1.
>
> My opinion would be to close the 1.21 soon (~1week timeframe). Please
> propose any changes that you think should get included.
>
> Thoughts? Anyone wants to volunteer as a release manager?
>
>
> Matteo
> --
> Matteo Merli
> <mme...@apache.org>
>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release

[Joe Francis]

That's great that YJ is going to drive 1.21.  But we would still need one
dev as the Release Manager, who will need to get the personal  key verified
.

Joe

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Nozomi Kurihara 
wrote:

> Hi Matteo,
>
>
> > Even though it's mostly fixes, I think it would still make sense to call
> the release 1.21.0 rather than 1.20.1.
>
>
> I think so too.
>
>
> > Anyone wants to volunteer as a release manager?
>
>
> If there are no objections, Yahoo! Japan pulsar team would like to be a
> release manager for the next release.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Nozomi
>
>
> 
> 差出人: Matteo Merli 
> 送信日時: 2017年10月27日 6:00:22
> 宛先: dev@pulsar.incubator.apache.org
> 件名: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release
>
> Hi all,
>
> since we have released pulsar-1.20.0-incubating, a lot of fixes have been
> committed.
> Though we don't have many new features, some of the fixes or improvements
> are significant and I think it would be good to create a release so that
> people trying out Pulsar won't encounter them.
>
> In particular, I'm thinking of :
>  * Enhancements to Kafka API wrapper to have it work with Kafka's own
> benchmark tools
>  * Fix to C++ partitioned consumer client
>  * Several fixes and improvements related to the namespace bundles
>
> Even though it's mostly fixes, I think it would still make sense to call
> the release 1.21.0 rather than 1.20.1.
>
> My opinion would be to close the 1.21 soon (~1week timeframe). Please
> propose any changes that you think should get included.
>
> Thoughts? Anyone wants to volunteer as a release manager?
>
>
> Matteo
> --
> Matteo Merli
> 
>

RE: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release

[Nozomi Kurihara]

Hi Matteo,


> Even though it's mostly fixes, I think it would still make sense to call
the release 1.21.0 rather than 1.20.1.


I think so too.


> Anyone wants to volunteer as a release manager?


If there are no objections, Yahoo! Japan pulsar team would like to be a release 
manager for the next release.


Thanks,


Nozomi



差出人: Matteo Merli 
送信日時: 2017年10月27日 6:00:22
宛先: dev@pulsar.incubator.apache.org
件名: [DISCUSSION] Next Pulsar release

Hi all,

since we have released pulsar-1.20.0-incubating, a lot of fixes have been
committed.
Though we don't have many new features, some of the fixes or improvements
are significant and I think it would be good to create a release so that
people trying out Pulsar won't encounter them.

In particular, I'm thinking of :
 * Enhancements to Kafka API wrapper to have it work with Kafka's own
benchmark tools
 * Fix to C++ partitioned consumer client
 * Several fixes and improvements related to the namespace bundles

Even though it's mostly fixes, I think it would still make sense to call
the release 1.21.0 rather than 1.20.1.

My opinion would be to close the 1.21 soon (~1week timeframe). Please
propose any changes that you think should get included.

Thoughts? Anyone wants to volunteer as a release manager?


Matteo
--
Matteo Merli